Clrnc really?
Someone else must have said this, then.
Clrnc One thing for sure, we need more instinctive moves from the players. They are overly coached, very little one touch stuffs unlike Liverpool. We often take too many touches and roboting the moves.
That's also why our counters are terrible
What is calling our players "overly coached" if not a criticism of the coach?
Maybe read back what you said before you reply next time mate.
RocktheCasbah so you inferred that it was a criticism of Arteta based on that 3 words? So if I said our corners are excellent, means it praising Arteta? Never knew it was a one man coaching team.
Anyway I stand by what I said, it wasn't meant for what you are overreacting it to be. It was a simple observation but you do you I guess.
Clrnc you're something else, truly. 
Who are you blaming for the team being "overly coached", if not Arteta?
Albert Air Pods, Carlos Cuesta, or Nico Jover? Come on, I think we should know...
For the record, I don't have a problem with you saying the team is overly coached, if that's what you think. I don't agree with you, but I'm sure we will continue to disagree, well, about most things Arsenal related and that's okay.
I do have a problem with you pretending you meant something else (and that I'm overreacting) when you said it.
in the main, liverpool have pursued and executed a superior brand of attacking football to arsenal for the last 10 years. it's a hard and uncomfortable truth, which is why some of us sound wounded in this thread.
Gazza M This. I had posted something similar in another thread around Liverpool's ability to consistently bring in attacking talent over the last 15 years while we all wring our hands that no one is available - dating all the way back to Torres. Even when they were yo-yoing up and down the table under Rodgers, this was the case. It's perhaps why VVD and Allisson have been critical to their success since this was the area of the pitch most neglected historically.
Bernard Woolley I think we were an equal or better attacking force during the Torres years. we still had cesc-rvp then. it shifted from the suarez years onwards. they have hit greater attacking heights than us under 3 different managers now
Gazza M in the main, liverpool have pursued and executed a superior brand of attacking football to arsenal for the last 10 years. it's a hard and uncomfortable truth, which is why some of us sound wounded in this thread.
Fact check: in the last two full league seasons, Arsenal has outscored Liverpool by 13 and 5 goals.
Claudius yeah but those kinds of stats don't always give you the full picture. For example our last 5 European away ties we've scored 5 goals which seems reasonable but by fixtures we actually failed to score in 4 games. So while the overall number looks okay it masks a pretty big issue. Failing to score in that amount of games more consistently gets you knocked out or is going to pretty significantly damage your title ambitions.
Liverpool are more exciting to watch, it's true. Then again, so are Tottenham.
Bring Back Kerrea Gilbert well Diaz has 7 goals. Saka has 5 and Martinelli has 4, Trossard has 3. Meanwhile Salah has 15. That's the real difference.
It's amazing that we've actively pursued replicating the tactics of the team that has won the last 4 consecutive titles, but fans would rather we were more like the team that has only won one.
No, they would rather we were more like the team that has only won one than like the one who has won zero.
Qwiss fair enough. I thought Saka had more than that 
Bring Back Kerrea Gilbert Saka has plenty of assists.
