sat in a global meeting this week. was interesting to see senior government representatives from all the major western countries condemn russia. all except one.
2024 US Election
JazzG I think it is a massive strategic mistake, Putin's Russia are only ever on your side if you give them everything they want. They don't do compromise. If your aiming to make them allies then you will be giving into whatever demands they have. I don't disagree there has been a reprioritisation and that trump would sell all of Europe to Russia if he could that's very much his attitude. It's why Europe needs to accept that the US are not your friends with this current administration.
On your point about dialogue that's fine but where has he condemned Russia. Everything is will Ukraine made this happen, blaming them for the invasion a decision that only Russia has responsibility for. Also the insulting idea that Ukraine should have done a deal giving up their territory to avoid the war. That policy has been known to be at successful through history at solving conflicts
If they think getting Russia on side stops an alliance with China that's proper deluded, Russia under Putin wants to act against Western interests and he will continue to play that game. If the US thinks they can deal with Putin they really haven't been paying attention. Also what will be China's calculation of launching a military invasion for territory they want. Stick the course the US will always give up in the end the will of authoritarian government will outlast the US and they will come for a deal for money eventually.
Russia in its entire history of existence has never had allies. It has had vassals and enemies, that's it.
JazzG How long did Europe expect to keep getting subsidized security for? They've pissed their money away on other things, neglected their defence and now scrambling around panicking about it. Europe has been benefitting from a peace dividend and that time is now up.
That is not even the worst part of it. Europe/EU has bought oil, gas, coal, fertilizer etc from Russia for €2-4 hundred billions since just 2022. The russian war effort is completely dependent on his funding (and western currency). All because of an insanely naive energy policy...
- Edited
Strategically, the US seems to have been happy to divide Europe and Russia since the short-lived attempt made by NATO to woo Russia ended in the late 00s.
Germany used to import around 5bn cubic metres of gas (as much as or more than €5–10bn in value I think …) per month from Russia until mid-late 2022, and the amount, whatever the real amount may be, is now stated as zero—and surely it must have collapsed with the loss of Nord Stream 1 and 2.
The "Ones and Tooze" podcast had an interesting episode discussing US energy security the other day. The US is now self-sufficient as far as energy goes due to onshore gas and renewable developments, notwithstanding a huge nett movement of gas and oil across its borders.
I would guess all mainstream parties in US politics, including "deep state" types, are very happy if the EU and Russia don't get on. Especially with Russia increasingly locked into the Chinese trajectory.
This makes the difference between Biden and Trump pretty much their wildly different agendas re: NATO.
Burnwinter yeah and the reality that the US under trump is not a European ally. In fact with their actions with Russia they are actually a threat to European security, so European leaders are going to have to get used to that and respond as necessary
awooga83 agree the US is definitely hostile to European security and energy interests - expensive American LNG vs cheap Russian gas, stoking wars in the Middle East knowing refugees will go to Europe as a result etc - but this has been the case since forever.
Even discounting all the documented interfering in European elections since the 40s - just on a very basic level why would the US as the world's sole superpower allow Europe to become a bloc that could become its rival? Because Western values and rules-based order?
Burnwinter official imports are zero, notwithstanding fossil products sold by Russia to India or other third countries and then re-sold to Germany with a different provenance label and a premium slapped on it.
To add to what you said US policy has always been to drive Russia and Europe and specifically Germany apart. If it were up to them Germany would have never been allowed to buy Russian gas for 30+ years, it was because of social democrat politicians who actually put German interests above American it did happen; all scholars agree the whole 'economic miracle' of rising from the ashes to a world economic power would have been impossible without cheap Russian gas.
Good objectives, but probably unrealistic.
jones why would the US as the world's sole superpower allow Europe to become a bloc that could become its rival? Because Western values and rules-based order?
Isn't that the lesson from the Suez crisis? US benevolence towards Europe was only to ensure a wealthy market for US products and the ensuing peace on the continent meant that the US didn't get pulled into generational wars while they were fighting the Soviets across the globe. Any real attempt to chart a course away from US interests has always been met swiftly and firmly.