It's the attitude of a man who was told by NATO nations he'd be given everything necessary to decisively win the war and has never accepted that it was a lie. He's a very unpleasant character rather than a hero, but from a practical point of view victimising Ukraine won't help conjure up a lasting peace.
JazzG the Americans
are going toare absolute arseholeshere
Fixed it for you!
Sort of seems to me he's been faced with the choice of fellating Trump or not before he gets sodomized, says no to the blowie. Il se fera enculer dans tous les cas. And you all blame him.
RowJimmy Il se fera enculer dans tous les cas
And let's spare a thought for the hundreds of thousands of conscripts killed in this war. Fuck all empires and fuck Putin, NATO and all three of Obama, Biden and Trump.
Burnwinter this totally, if you create a situation, which seems to be occurring here, if humiliating Ukraine making them give an the concessions and bringing Russia back into the world you aren't creating a sustainable peace. You have shown Russia that there is no consequence from launching an invasion of a neighbour. The same message will be seen globally.
I mean the other side is you can't trust the Americans right now nobody is their allies Putin is closer then Abby country the wau they have set up. This has massively damaged then externally not that they will care I guess.
Burnwinter Vance is an extraordinary animal.
Reminds me of a mouthy little prick who's always hiding behind someone bigger. Such a punchable face.
Absolute clown
Seems like the sort of thing Trump would love tbf.
I'm shook by that spectacle. I think it'll prove to be one of the most consequential moments in global politics, or western politics at least, in a very long time.
That is the reality of the situation, the conversation got nasty but this wasn’t some big set up like the media are making it out, if you watch the whole clip one comment seemed to trigger this all off. This is a real shit situation for Ukraine but he doesn’t have any other options, it’s that simple. He has run out of road and needs to show more diplomacy. The whole world know what kind of person Trump is, when you are relying on him you have to pander to him. That is what Starmer did yesterday and he came out well out of his meeting. The European leaders kind words aren’t gonna win you the war, only the Americans are gonna save him.
One thing really interesting is the British media seem united in their belief that Ukraine should fight on until the end and seem to think the only way this war should end is with Putin’s complete defeat, what planet are these people living on? I don’t like Putin and don’t want him to win this war but fucking hell man it is time to face reality as well.
JazzG Starmer did yesterday and he came out well out of his meeting
He may have come put well in a PR sense but his meeting was a total failure, given the entire purpose of it was to try to persuade Trump to adopt a more moderate position on Ukraine.
Don't disagree with the assessment you posted but the WW3 warning with regards to America offering more support is pretty pejorative. There are any number of ways via any of the three scenarios mentioned that lead to WW3.
Zelenskyy desperately needs to buy time. A humiliating cease fire is probably the only way to do that, save for some curve ball like China involving itself.
JazzG I agree.
But the reason this is big news isn’t because the US is dismissive of the concerns of smaller countries (fuck knows how the US will approach Israel v Palestine).
If Russia decided to push forward and occupy a Baltic state will the US intervene? Is NATO a credible deterrent? If not, is there even any point in Europe expanding its military budget if all their weapon systems are reliant on the US anyway? And if the US isn’t the solution to European defence, exactly how much of will it cost to build a replacement model and how much will that cost an ageing continent with anaemic growth. What would that do for European solidarity? My worst case view is that by the end of this century Europe will be carved up by Russia (Eastern Europe), the US (Western Europe) and China (whatever’s left) if Europe + UK don’t recognise the hand their dealt
Qwiss haven't really clocked him speaking before but he's a total weasel. I thought it was interesting when Zelenskyy said have you been to Ukraine and he instinctively said yes ugh I've seen it on TV. That's not going to be the same. Such a scum bag berates Zelenskyy for needing to say thanks to us right here why haven't you and then after goading him you shouldn't have done this in front of the press, you totally started this you clown.
It's funny the US internally seem to think this looks good for them but they look risky pathetic and fully subservient to Russia.. It's laughable that trump can claim he's good at deas.
jones did you believe Russia would march into Crimea when they did it that they would resort to attempting to kill people with poisoning in the UK because I would have said exactly as you, there is no way. The history of the world is littered with moves that seemed totally disastrous or like they were never going to happen. Who knows what lesson Putin takes from this but it isn't going to be the end. He'll have won his "patriotic war" Russia is a big nation we can't be bullied and with a Trump president maybe he can just say help me get this piece of land.
jones not imminently but it is a strategic objective that Russia would be prepared to wait out.
NATO even without US support is potent on paper but the absence of Tier 1 leadership would most likely fragment the alliance over the longer term (beyond this administration) and once the will is lost then all bets are off imo.
More interestingly, the US, China, Russia and even emerging players like India see the world very differently to Europe (civilisational empires vs neo-colonial). I think it’s only a matter of time before their view will prevail
jones do you really believe Russia would invade a the Baltics?
To be fair, the question of Russia invading the Baltics here is about whether Europe should re-militarise under the aegis of a treaty without the United States.
Other than the situation in Ukraine, what else would a re-militarised Europe be expecting to defend itself against, if not a Russian incursion into a Baltic state?
I guess the answer is that the situation in Ukraine may require European security guarantees, and NATO might no longer be a viable mechanism to deliver them. So something the EU cooks up in the next six months looks pretty likely.
Mirth there is also the fact Russia's gambles have paid off and seen no significant push back. Maybe Russia didn't believe that the US would get involved if they went after a near neighbour. The lesson from this is America don't want to be involved and Putin is a gambler and he's been winning so it's not impossible he thinks he could out manoeuvre the west and they don't have the stomach to do anything.
Mirth not buying it, Russia has been reactive in most conflicts so far. Sure you could look at hypothetical Russian strategic objectives that might pan out if NATO falls apart after the US pulls out and infighting in Europe causes the group to lose the "will" relevant but that'd be a bit weird when today you actually have German soldiers and tanks participating in military exercises 100 miles from St. Petersburg.
The last paragraph is interesting but not sure I understood it correctly. You say the Americans Indians and Chinese have one world view opposed to that of Europe?
