QuincyAbeyie Sorry Quincy, but I really despised that film. Sexless English public school pornography, Matthew Vaughn doing Guy Ritchie. Speaking of which I think MAN FROM U.N.C.L.E. was better than it, though still bad.
The womanisation is not quite the issue, it's more subtle. The character can no longer be portrayed without a certain "he's psychologically tough enough to love 'em and leave 'em" shock factor built in.
The successes of feminism have generated a heteromasculine ressentiment that makes this almost unavoidable. Today even when gender conservatives make deliberately revanchist, sexist films or novels, they make some form of concession to the problem just by celebrating "Look, we've got our misogynistic James Bond back" or similar. This creates a butthurt "crying wojak" vibe to these works that means they never fully satisfy the originary resentful manbaby urge.
Of course, the manbabies say they enjoy the works, but ultimately, no one wants to remember them. No one thinks the Snyder cut is any good.
It's a cultural variation of the second law of thermodynamics—we all know that women are politically equal to men now, whether we like it or not.
An animated Bond (ARCHER played straight), or Bond done as the video of a pop song, or a ballet could overcome this perhaps, that gets around the problems of the media with forced habits of richer psychological depiction.
So my suggestion to these people, if they really "want Bond back" would be: get Austin Butler to learn a public school boy accent, change the character's name to James Man, and film the whole thing as an action ballet in the Stahelski style, interspersed with Brechtian monologues derived from some fascist substack, and 8½ WEEKS style simulated sex scenes with currently leading OnlyFans girls. Unfortunately, Bezos will never approve such a vision.