Suarez: the great moral dilemma of our time: Page 17 - The Arsenal discussion community: One More in the Tolly

Suarez: the great moral dilemma of our time

TambourineMan

It does seem as though none of the bigger club want anything to do with Suarez which is why we even have a chance of signing someone as good as him. I say take it. I don't think I'll ever like him but sometimes you gotta compromise.

Biggus

Alfonso wrote:
Just sign him and get it over with.

Yes he's a cunt, yes he is. Good for nothing racist scum cheating piece of shit.

But minimum he will score 25 goals.

His name on our team sheet will minimum give us 10 extra points.

All of the above is worth more than his asking price.

signing no striker is a lot bigger crime.

I'm ready to sell out as his arrival will be massive and send shock waves in the league.

Arsenal will be talked about and hated again and that's what we've wanted for years.

Fair play Alf, I've been re reading this thread and you always rated Suarez even before it was fashionable.
As I said before in the other thread that was locked- I want us to be hated too, but because we are jammy and win things not because we have a cunt like him in our team.

Anyhoo, time for a look at this classic again.

[/i]

Bold Tone

Seems like the Suarez issue is not really a great moral dilemma afterall.
Excuse the pun, but it seems to be a clear black and white issue amongst us fans.
There is hardly any fence sitting or gnashing of teeth going on.

Personally, as if i haven't made myself clear, i would prefer us to act the cunt and sabotage the spuds move for Soldado rather than buy the cunt that guarantees meeting with the FA and you know how much they love us already!

None of that messing about in midfield, this guy seems to be a proper goal-hanging number 9 with pace and skills to boot!

lorddulaarsenal

No thanks to soldado

Bold Tone

Is he that bad?

Biggus

Bold Tone wrote:
None of that messing about in midfield, this guy seems to be a proper goal-hanging number 9 with pace and skills to boot!

I love those kind of players selfish blinkered bastards who only have eyes for the goal, like Wrighty in the old days.

But Y'Know......Wenger knows.....

Tony Montana

Henry?

Is he too much of a Wenger player Biggus?

Bold Tone

It's possible to like both if the results are good as i loved both Wrighty and Henry.

@ Dules or any La Liga expert.
That is a genuine question re:Soldado.

Biggus

Tony Montana wrote:
Henry?

Is he too much of a Wenger player Biggus?

He was the complete player he could dance he could sing he could do everything.

lorddulaarsenal

Bold Tone wrote:
It's possible to like both if the results are good as i loved both Wrighty and Henry.

@ Dules or any La Liga expert.
That is a genuine question re:Soldado.

He's not bad, but he's not top notch. Think they're better off targeting a younger player

ebouefan

@lorddulaarsenal wrote:
http://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/2892/transfer-zone/2013/07/23/4138046/arsenal-lodge-42-million-bid-for-suarez?ICID=HP_BN_1

Only shitty sources like Mail, Metro and Goal.com are picking this up. Maybe they based this on the Geoff tweet.

Nevermind: It's in tomorrow's Guardian too. Geoff on the money for a change.

Offered them 40m + Wenger's packet of crisps. Rejected but we can apparently talk to him.

Bold Tone

How does Geoff get the credit when we have been discussing this amongst ourselves for days based on comments from Suarez, his agent, Liverpool, Brendon Rodgers, Tom, Dick and Harry.

@lorddulaarsenal wrote:
He's not bad, but he's not top notch. Think they're better off targeting a younger player

Obviously we would prefer an upgrade, so is he marginally or much better than Giroud?

lorddulaarsenal

Bold Tone wrote:
@lorddulaarsenal wrote:
He's not bad, but he's not top notch. Think they're better off targeting a younger player

Obviously we would prefer an upgrade, so is he marginally or much better than Giroud?

I think giroud is better

But then I think giroud is underrated here

Bold Tone

If he is worse than the G-meister, then spurs are welcome to him.

Conor

Soldado is a decent player and would probably improve us, but he's really not any better than who we've already been linked to. He'd be a very good signing for Tottenham though (or Liverpool if they sell Suarez).

Biggus

@lorddulaarsenal wrote:
But then I think giroud is underrated here

Indeed, and if Wenger was a better manager he would know how to use him to advantage.

Captain

How is he being misused?

Iloveyouarsenewenger

Wow. Now Suarez knows that we have bid for him. It must be a revelation to him.

I wonder what the point of inserting such a clause in the contract is. Did anyone realistically think that a high profile bid will be made for the player and he won't be aware of it?

ebouefan

Bold Tone wrote:
How does Geoff get the credit when we have been discussing this amongst ourselves for days based on comments from Suarez, his agent, Liverpool, Brendon Rodgers, Tom, Dick and Harry.

Obviously we would prefer an upgrade, so is he marginally or much better than Giroud?

Predicted the day and amount correctly.

Bold Tone

ebouefan wrote:
Predicted the day and amount correctly.

Are the figures and dates very different from what his agent/agents have been saying all along?

« Previous Page Next Page »