Elon is exhausting. His move fast and break things way of working is fine in Silicon Valley where we are competing to build better tech.
But when we move into government and it’s literally people’s livelihoods, dignity and safety, this absence of safeguards and empathy is catastrophic. @JazzG, what do you say today to people who’ve had to start this week without access to critical HIV medicines and other clinical care? Or black people who fund themselves on DEI hitlists when the concept of DEI has helped us with things like paternity leave or even WFH. What do you say to white South African farmers whose currency is suddenly 10% weaker because Elon and Trump spread lies about a land expropriation bill that reads exactly like US law on the same matter?

Fucking joke

Claudius Elon is exhausting. His move fast and break things way of working is fine in Silicon Valley

no man, moving fast and breaking things is not exclusively an Elon thing. It's this administration's playbook. It is damned easy to just break things, especially if you're running a cult that's formed of two cults that will fully support their cult leaders breaking their own things.

JazzG I follow some very left leaning accounts as well but again not really relevant.

I think the more salient point here is not which accounts you follow but that you're getting so much of your news from social media. I'm not picking on you here, I think most of us do so now, it's very hard not to. I stopped using twitter and Facebook quite some ago but even now I still sometimes get stories fed to me via the android newsfeed and there's still the YouTube algo continually trying to push my buttons. It's a real problem and fwiw I don't think reading a variety of left and right viewpoints really addresses the problem.

JazzG Just sorting this out over local and national governments would probably result in a sizeable savings. Anyone who has run a business this is just bog standard stuff, even for smaller businesses. Loads more stuff is gonna come out, ridiculous how governments are run in this day and age.

In isolation the numbers might look large. £250k is a big number, more than I'll ever see in my life, but relative to the budget of that department, or the NHS in general its peanuts. I'm not saying systems shouldn't improve, but that was caught. I've no doubt organisations like the NHS, or various Government departments could be more efficient in their outlook, but the scale of fraud in such organisations is unlikely to wiggle the needle never mind move it.

I suspect you've very little idea of how Governments are run to be honest. On your other comment about full transparency on where our money goes - there are thousands of reports, insight documents, reviews and various other publications on the National Audit Office website that you could start today and won't finish by the time you've popped your clogs. It's not to the detailed level of finding some chancer spotting a flaw in an NHS system and filing false invoices, but there is plenty that that does give transparency and insight on many of the issues, problems, and in many cases actual successes of the various different Government departments and agencies. Problem is you don't want transparency, you want outrage.

Pepe LeFrits I'm trying to cut back on social media but your point about the trans issue is interesting. My timeline just now is saturated with an employment tribunal case involving a trans doctor who was sharing a female changing room with a nurse. I've had one brief interaction that referenced it. Aside from the poisonous nature of the trans debate itself, it also ropes in the Scottish Independence debate, another issue which if you believed social media was front and centre of every discussion, but in the real world is rarely discussed in everyday life.

Pepe LeFrits probably right for most, but in higher education this is an issue of daily life. I also have multiple roles in regional youth sports programming, so it feels much more present in my world regardless of what's happening online.

awooga83 mate they may be working on the audit but it doesn't mean they are telling you the truth. I've questioned their accounts because they have been proven to be liars that for me blows your credibility as a source of reliable information

I think you've already decided they are lying and not really interested in what they find, fair enough.

Gazza M nice try on the democrat whataboutism, but again wrong. if Bill Gates and a team of his engineers were sent in to 'clean up' government spending it would be an equally shitty idea, and would probably spark violence from the right.

Elon Musk hasn't just appeared out of thin air to suddenly go through the government's books. Trump campaigned on this, this was one of his key policies and therefore considering he was voted in, he has a mandate from the American people to do this.

Gazza M then your media diet is dogshit and explains alot of your takes

Good for you, again with this elitist mentality that some have on here. Your opinions are more valid and mine are clearly formed from dogshit media.

RowJimmy This is something we already have a great deal of evidence about.

Lets be honest even if they were being honest and truthful you wouldn't want to know.

Mirth The UK government exchanged convicted prisoners with Albania - something that Albania are not obliged to accept - so they negotiated a settlement fee which included sending electric vehicles to the prison

I don't really have a problem with this stuff, as long as the government gets a return on the money then fine. I mean wouldn't it just be easier to say here is money to take them back?

Claudius @JazzG, what do you say today to people who’ve had to start this week without access to critical HIV medicines and other clinical care? Or black people who fund themselves on DEI hitlists when the concept of DEI has helped us with things like paternity leave or even WFH. What do you say to white South African farmers whose currency is suddenly 10% weaker because Elon and Trump spread lies about a land expropriation bill that reads exactly like US law on the same matter?

Of course any worthwhile aid should be restarted as soon as possible but they also need to get their finances in order otherwise even those worthwhile causes will get permanently stopped. I think last year the US deficit was $2 trillion, I think their debt is now 100% of GDP, how is that sustainable?

DEI started off with good intentions and some aspects are still good but some of it has morphed into a load of bullshit. You hear about certain minorities getting pushed ahead of others. In California I remember reading recently where Asians are now being discriminated against despite having better grades. How does that benefit anyone? My accountant's assistant is from India and he told me a story about a version of DEI which has existed there for many years. He didn't get a government job despite having better marks than others because he was from a higher caste. In his entrance exams he said he scored over 70% and some people with scores in the 40s got in over him. I don't see how this helps anyone. Again this probably started off with good intentions to help the citizens of those castes but eventually becomes destructive and lowers standards. On the Times the other day there was an article "Universities failing to promote diversity will face funding cuts", I don't see how that helps? I'm not white and I went to university, I got into a decent university but why should I have an advantage of over others and get entry into an elite university because I'm not white? That is just ridiculous to me, I think I'd have imposter syndrome if that was ever the case. We've gone almost from one form of discrimination to another.

I don't really know or fully understand the situation in South Africa so I won't comment about that.

Pepe LeFrits I don't mind mate, I get picked on all the time here I don't just get my news from Social Media. I'll usually have a browse on the BBC and The Times but occasionally I'll take a look at the Telegraph and the Guardian. Those two papers obviously have a clear bias but there is sometimes some good stuff on there.

I get the impression that a few on here think I'm some kind of far right loonie and that is fine. I do think some people on here are drifting so far left everyone else seems far right to them!

Tam In isolation the numbers might look large. £250k is a big number, more than I'll ever see in my life, but relative to the budget of that department, or the NHS in general its peanuts.

I'm guessing by that attitude you probably work for a government department! God knows how much other fraud took place, it might have happened after she left but no full audit took place to find out what else has gone missing and no further control methods were implemented after that happened. One person left and then all hushed up. That post of yours just simply sums it up, oh its only £250k from a large budget...

Tam Problem is you don't want transparency, you want outrage.

It is not really a problem is it? I just have a different view to you, or maybe you see that as a problem?

@JazzG, that’s literally not the intent of DEI. I am not from South Africa but live and work here in the services sector. My organisation’s leadership is full of white men from Europe. Even when I look at the broader org, there is good representation of men from SA in higher roles. Now if I look at high school and university marks in SA, women far outperform men. But in places like mine, they are under-represented. Because they hear about us less, we interview with more bias against them because we are a bunch of men, they leave more rapidly because they don’t want to work 12 hour days and travel all over Africa while fulfilling traditional gender roles and popping out babies. Add all that up, and you end up with a tough time time growing the women base.

So you actually need to actively create programs to grow and retain women. Doesn’t mean that the women are too stupid for the work. They juat face a million structural constraints that make their lives a lot harder than a man’s. That’s what DEI is about. It’s not about getting stupid people into your company.

JazzG I think you've already decided they are lying and not really interested in what they find, fair enough.

As I mentioned in my reply, I don't believe outright claims they make no because they have shown themselves to be dishonest in things they have said related to this very topic so it makes me sceptical at the outset. If they however provide the actual evidence and source information of their allegations to the public so that people can see see for themselves and it supports their claims then fair enough. I don't think that's an unreasonable position to take.

Your presumption seems to be that what they claim is the truth even without the evidence to I support it. You want transparency from government, why can't we have transparency from Musk et al?

awooga83 You want transparency from government, why can't we have transparency from Musk et al?

lol, it's so obvious it's ridiculous that you even have to write it aloud.

These pathetic business idiots think they're special because they have money. They are pitiful little weak-willed snowflakes who can't take even a shred of criticism without going ballistic.

For them, transparency is for the underpaid, overworked bureaucrat who foolishly dedicated their life to public service. They should have been born rich and bought themselves more money by bribing and extorting the US government like all the other business idiots, then they wouldn't cry so hard.

Claudius it's the framing that bothers me. It's blatantly racist.

Qwiss

It's everywhere. Young men are becoming more right wing (and women more liberal) - even in norway and denmark. Some surveys suggest it is a reaction to cultural issues.

JazzG Why does it matter which account I posted the video from?

It doesn't. Kudos for sticking to the issue.

I agree with the goal of Musk and Trump. Not sure they are doing it the right/most efficient way though.. we'll see in a year or two. Reducing the bureaucracy (in size and power) is necessary. Liberal democracies need more democracy (populism) and a less liberalism (institutions).

Populism isn't democratic, particularly in its current form where it relies heavily on mis/disinformation distributed through social media