jones I don't know why you bring the Deveselu shield into the cold war argument or even the RIM-161. The RIM was operational like 2-3 years after U.S. withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Trearty. Also like I said, Deveselu hosts only three launchers, which is laughable in the context of nuclear war. Even if modified, it wouldn't be able to stop a Russian nuclear barrage. And like I said It is almost impossible to use SM-3 missiles for offensive strikes — they lack explosive warheads. Even Russia knows Deveselu can't stop their ICBMs, but they use it as an excuse to justify the shit they do.
"Syria for 14 years, Burkina Faso or Mali" you're just throwing out anything at this point.
Yeah, I'm just casually throwing a few of the conflicts they've fueled, while you conveniently ignore the other 20 wars they've triggered in Eastern Europe, none caused by NATO.
And don't get me wrong, I'm not a fan of the West or the U.S., but this whataboutism people use to defend Russia is getting ridiculous.
Yes, some NATO countries and the U.S. have done their fair share of shit, but put together, it's still nothing compared to what Russia has done and continues to do.
They are, and always will be, an imperialist country, Fuck em all is what I'm saying.
If you really believe countries are independent and sovereign and can do what they want I don't think there's much common ground to find, we'll have to agree to disagree mate.
But if they aren't, then why are the 2 of us even talking about European colonialism in Africa?
If the strong do what they want, and the weak suffer what they must, then we should all just lay down and take it, right?
No response, no resistance — just accept imperialism and shut the fuck up.