2024 US Election
Though to roll with the bad analogy for a moment, who congratulates the head of a household for saving money by starving the family? Even in bourgeois economics it's the role of the state to play caretaker making sure society and economy reproduce themselves. 
- Edited
jones I'm not comparing, businesses need to obviously turn a profit whereas governments need to not be racking up stupidly deficits every year and sinking under their own debt. The way the US government finances are being handled simply is not sustainable long term, short term nothing is going to happen to be fair. This is also what Trump campaigned on, he said he would balance the budget and use Elon Musk to look at trimming bureaucracy and wastage.
Burnwinter Though to roll with the bad analogy for a moment, who congratulates the head of a household for saving money by starving the family?
I am not aware of any US citizens being starved by the current government cuts?
QuincyAbeyie Of course you'd hope they are looking at things carefully before just cutting them but clear there are mistakes being made. Mistake which they have acknowledged as well.
Qwiss I think he does care about his legacy a lot, he probably thinks he is doing this to make the country better. Whether he actually does is another story though, his ego being one of many stumbling blocks! If this goes bad he'll get punished in the midterms and end up a lame duck president, his majority in the house is very thin.
Some of the stuff redacted has been available online and that information is unredacted lol.JazzG US government finances not being sustainable long term is something you'll need to substantiate. Generally public debt is not comparable at all to private debt, they're so fundamentally different they shouldn't even be called same name.
Economies have a public (govt), private (businesses and households) and a foreign sector, the sum of their balances always being zero. When the private sector is a net saver (i.e. saves more than it invests) which has been the case in most of the western world for decades then you need either the foreign sector to balance the books in your favour (i.e. get other countries to import more than you import from them, e.g. the German model) or you need the government to step in, otherwise your economy shrinks and nosedives.
What would be unsustainable long term is if governments followed your advice and stopped racking up deficits because that would mean there is no one to balance the private sector's lack of investment, the rest of the world literally can't do it for each other by definition so the only alternative to the govt doing it would be finding aliens willing to go in debt for us.
jones US government finances not being sustainable long term is something you'll need to substantiate.
US debt has grown more in the last 10 years than it did in the previous 200+ years. Deficit has averaged 3.8% of GDP over the past 50 years, it is currently at 6.2% and projected to come down to 5.2% by 2027 and then rise back up to by 2035. I ain't no financial expert like you but that doesn't sound very good to me.
jones What would be unsustainable long term is if governments followed your advice
My advice would be for them to cut down on wasteful spending and fraud, I think they'll be fine if they do that.
JazzG Of course you'd hope they are looking at things carefully before just cutting them but clear there are mistakes being made. Mistake which they have acknowledged as well.
That they are aware of, there is a strong likelihood, given the amount of climb downs and admissions, that they are making lots of mistakes and no doubt they will not realise with all of them.
It's why I and others made the point about you can't just believe what these guys claim without showing the evidence to prove it. Not because I made my mind up about musk but his track record is one of misinformation and lies which looks like it's coming out in this stuff and it's entirely consistent with what he's previously done. He claims everything is fraud that he found 8bn then actually it's 8m and there were big mistakes. How can you have any confidence in the people doing this work and making these claims when they are doing that regularly.
JazzG debt naturally will go up when you have external shocks like covid or when global supply chains are broken like in 2022, on its own it's a number that doesn't mean anything. Algeria has a debt to gdp ratio of under 50%, Italy of 130% and Japan sits at 260%, can you infer anything from these figures?
Agree cutting down on wasteful spending and fraud is sound advice, but like most sound advice it's pretty much useless in reality - most governments believe it or not already try to do that every day. One positive that came off it in the US at least is that USAID seems to be crippled for the foreseeable.
The most important thing to do to bring the deficit under control is to collect taxes owed rather than making it impossible for the IRS to do so.
Your information sources are a stream of raw sewage.
- Edited
JazzG I am not aware of any US citizens being starved by the current government cuts?
You have no clue, best to just stop opining on this country's domestic politics.
We literally have people starving, 15 million children hungry, and millions more in food precarity. Food in the UK is dirt cheap compared to the US. Hell, I'm struggling to feed my family because of these policies and I have a decent job.
Coombs Which specific current cuts have caused these children to starve?
jones One positive that came off it in the US at least is that USAID seems to be crippled for the foreseeable.
Why am I not surprised you liked USAID being nuked 
I do agree with you though...
As for your other points, I'm just making a general observation that the US has been racking up a lot of debt very quickly and running at a historically very high deficit. I personally don't think governments try that hard to save wastage, main reason is it isn't their money. Warren Buffett once joked that he could end the deficit by passing a law saying if it was above 3% of GDP all members of congress would be ineligible for re-election. His point I think is they don't really care. Politicians will throw money around, once it is time for them to leave end up in highly paid private work while other people pick up the mess they left behind.
JazzG I am not aware of any US citizens being starved by the current government cuts?
There's tens of millions who are living below the official poverty line in the United States, not that DOGE put them there. But if anyone wants to "make the place great" surely that'd be where to do some real work.
Burnwinter they've literally paused federal reimbursements and even cut programs that subsidize infrastructure, energy, and basic necessities, mostly affecting poor working people, mostly white at that. This affects food banks, water, electricity, etc.
Water bills are dependent on federal grants for ongoing infrastructure developments. If the feds won't reimburse, bill goes up. Same for energy, food, etc. Food banks are stretched thin, and families already on the brink are being pushed over the edge.
I've sat by the hospital bed of a 5 year old who was near death from starvation in this fuckhole of a country, which relies on individuals to give up their own comforts to rescue a few from the pits of despair they are directly driven to by corporations and the governments that serve them.
DOGE is literally starving people. Killing people. JazzyGs sassy ideological excrement is an abortion of thought that deserves no response but utter disdain.
The people cheering for DOGE are the ones who think the most unfair thing about society is that they happen to pay a bit too much tax.
Coombs What? Seriously what the fuck does that even mean? What specific government policies made you such prick?
It means we are talking about the current cuts by DOGE. You said 15m kids are going hungry because of them so I asked you which of their cuts are causing these kids to go hungry, were they not going hungry before the new administration came in? No need for the insults. I get it you don't like the current lot,
No specific government policy made me a prick, reading some of the opinions on here has
Coombs JazzyGs sassy ideological excrement is an abortion of thought that deserves no response but utter disdain.
Firstly my name is not JazzyG. Petty insults coming out now, insult me all you like if it makes you feel better.
JazzG why would you be surprised? If you look into USAID's track record and don't celebrate their demise there's something wrong with you imo.
Buffett is part of the problem, except he most likely understands how economies work and still chats shit to influence economic policy in his interest. Politicians across the West cause a LOT more damage in comparison by not spending enough rather than spending too much, and if it is the latter it's always because some harebrained dickhead just told them to pump 5% of their GDP into bombs.
jones why would you be surprised? If you look into USAID's track record and don't celebrate their demise there's something wrong with you imo.
I was being sarcastic, saw Mike Benz on Joe Rogan the other day talking about USAID and he had an interesting quote, if it was too dirty for the CIA they gave it to USAID! Remember years ago a Pakistani guy I know telling me about USAID and how it was a bit shady.