- Edited
What kind of money should we expect for Tierney?
What kind of money should we expect for Tierney?
£40m
£60m
If it is Newcastle, anything from £40mil and up.
To be honest, £45mil plus incentives.
Good test for Edu this one, conditions are there to make a tidy sum. Anything over £30m would be a decent enough deal imo.
What did we buy him for? Some of the price was probably tax for expected improvement that hasn't really happened, so the only reason to get more for him than what we paid is the inflation in the market, really.
£25m we bought him for. He's now Premier League proven and in his prime and a very good defender and not bad going forward. £40million is fair for improving a rival.
I'd rather we kept him and played him.
You’d start him?
Definitely think £30m would be mildly disappointing a fee if we sold him. Sure, we overpaid when we bought him but why shouldn't we make Newcastle do the same? He's shown he's a top LB in the PL and even if he no longer fits our style it doesn't diminish how good a player he is.
lorddulaarsenal I'd rotate him with Zinchenko. There's plenty of games to go around.
I don't think we could ask for 2 better LBs albeit with different playstyles but I would hope we could turn that into a positive.
Maybe I'm just soft like Wenger and not ruthless enough . I would be sad to see him go. He has been 1 of our better players throughout his time here.
If its Newcastle, we have to at least get 30-35m for him.
We also have to factor in that Zinchenko is very injury prone so will need to replace Tierney with an adequate player who can step in when needed. So we definitely should not be selling on the cheap.
In the current market it should be around 45m. Bearing in mind they bought Botman for 40m, Gordon for 45m, Willock for 25m, Wood for 25m etc.
Aside from Wood most of those fees are not too bad for the players they were signing actually, especially Bruno G. They were also all starters at their clubs who didn't want to get rid.
The guy he can't get ahead of cost us £30m despite being a serial winner so if Edu gets anywhere near £40m I'd be very impressed. By our current standards we're probably looking at 15m though...
We are absolute mugs if we sell Tierney at a loss. One of the best LBs out there. Just because he doesn't fit our style now doesnt mean he isnt good
Clrnc what should Zinchenko cost in the current market?
I don't get why it's always the LB that has to play the inverted role, why not ask Ben White to do it and then have Tierney playing more as a CB when we are on the ball? Saka is more adept at playing out wide with little support from the full backs compared to Trossard/Martinelli.
Also, surely it's better to have players in the squad who can give you something different especially when plan A isn't working? There have certainly been instances when I felt the inverted LB thing wasn't working and our whole left side was dead and thought we should have used Tierney as an overlapping full back to at least help us generate chances from that side. This could have created more space for Saka on the other end.
Because Basic Ben White (much like Tierney) doesn't have the technical ability, short passing or dribbling of Zinchenko.
You can't just say hey flobaba go and play like Maradona.
Also Tierney lacks the composure required to play center back. He panics when isolated or put under pressure and is more of a boot it into touch type. Martinez is a great shout though. Lockdown defender, smart, and very good on the ball. Real shame he chose to go to Man U. But we can clearly see the sort of player we desire/need for the fullback role.