flobaba wrote:

For me, it’s clear what the club needs to do. Go into the market and get 2 starting quality midfielders. We know we need to replace Xhaka (one of Tielemans or Maddison?) And eventually Partey’s situation will resolve itself one way or another. If it’s positive, good for us, we have him back and an extra body in there for squad depth and competition. He wasn’t exactly the most durable last season anyway. If it’s a negative outcome, then we are covered as well.

The links to Kante are a bit more plausible if we are taking this approach, as the wait and see path isn’t very sensible in my view.

there doesn't seem to be serious appetite for midfielder recruitment so far this window. hopefully the quiet period of the last 2 weeks represents edu and co pivoting away from wingers and centre halves

Anzac wrote:

jones wrote:

Yeah really. Why do you ask, are you a pig?

Also if you want to correct him - cooperation isn't wrong in this case either - it's spelt corroboration

Juvenile comment and slang from bad TV shows from the '70s and '80s.

Mate, it's a thousand times more juvenile to hate on the Mourinhos and even Kanes of this world than cops. 

Anzac wrote:

jones wrote:

Yeah really. Why do you ask, are you a pig?

Also if you want to correct him - cooperation isn't wrong in this case either - it's spelt corroboration

Juvenile comment and slang from bad TV shows from the '70s and '80s.

I've got this image of Neil from the Young Ones in my mind now. Although that was a good show.

Anzac wrote:

jones wrote:

Yeah really. Why do you ask, are you a pig?

Also if you want to correct him - cooperation isn't wrong in this case either - it's spelt corroboration

Juvenile comment and slang from bad TV shows from the '70s and '80s.

Corroborative evidence is far more important than any cooperation unless the latter is required to establish an offence.
Before I moved to AUS they changed the law in NZL in regards to domestic violence so that the victim did not need to press charges in order for the offending party to be arrested and charged, IF there was sufficient evidence to do so.

"Juvenile" you've been calling Adebayor and Anelka "Greedy" and "le sulk" for a couple decades mate. Not sure you're in any position to correct people on what's hip slang either way, what do you think they call constables these days?

The last "if" part is obviously the relevant contingency here. The CPS can arrest and charge people for sexual crimes without the victim's say so, but there's usually very little evidence (for arrest or charges) without the victim's statement and cooperation.

Quincy Abeyie wrote:

Anzac wrote:

Juvenile comment and slang from bad TV shows from the '70s and '80s.

Mate, it's a thousand times more juvenile to hate on the Mourinhos and even Kanes of this world than cops. 

Well he's named after a military corps after all, not exactly surprising he'd disapprove of people being critical of police.

Asterix wrote:

Anzac wrote:

Juvenile comment and slang from bad TV shows from the '70s and '80s.

I've got this image of Neil from the Young Ones in my mind now. Although that was a good show.

So is Jones Rick or Vyvyan?

jones wrote:

Anzac wrote:

Juvenile comment and slang from bad TV shows from the '70s and '80s.

Corroborative evidence is far more important than any cooperation unless the latter is required to establish an offence.
Before I moved to AUS they changed the law in NZL in regards to domestic violence so that the victim did not need to press charges in order for the offending party to be arrested and charged, IF there was sufficient evidence to do so.

"Juvenile" you've been calling Adebayor and Anelka "Greedy" and "le sulk" for a couple decades mate. Not sure you're in any position to correct people on what's hip slang either way, what do you think they call constables these days?

The last "if" part is obviously the relevant contingency here. The CPS can arrest and charge people for sexual crimes without the victim's say so, but there's usually very little evidence (for arrest or charges) without the victim's statement and cooperation.

Yeah the circumstances in regards to domestic violence are different to this scenario, however the Greenwood situation is very much about corroboration rather than cooperation.
It's always much harder to produce strong corroborative evidence when the alleged offence is not reported until some later, particularly in regards to sexual assaults.

As for the other IMO there is a difference in referring to an individual from a specific incident/s, as opposed to a general tarring everyone of a type with the same brush.  As such IMO it's no different in principle to the thought process of racism.

Quincy Abeyie wrote:

Anzac wrote:

Juvenile comment and slang from bad TV shows from the '70s and '80s.

Mate, it's a thousand times more juvenile to hate on the Mourinhos and even Kanes of this world than cops. 

That says more about tribalism & the nature of football supporters as anything and is still specific compared to a generalisation.

Anzac wrote:

Quincy Abeyie wrote:

Mate, it's a thousand times more juvenile to hate on the Mourinhos and even Kanes of this world than cops. 

That is still specific compared to a generalisation.

Anzac wrote:

jones wrote:

"Juvenile" you've been calling Adebayor and Anelka "Greedy" and "le sulk" for a couple decades mate. Not sure you're in any position to correct people on what's hip slang either way, what do you think they call constables these days?

The last "if" part is obviously the relevant contingency here. The CPS can arrest and charge people for sexual crimes without the victim's say so, but there's usually very little evidence (for arrest or charges) without the victim's statement and cooperation.

Yeah the circumstances in regards to domestic violence are different to this scenario, however the Greenwood situation is very much about corroboration rather than cooperation.
It's always much harder to produce strong corroborative evidence when the alleged offence is not reported until some later, particularly in regards to sexual assaults.

As for the other IMO there is a difference in referring to an individual from a specific incident/s, as opposed to a general tarring everyone of a type with the same brush.  As such IMO it's no different in principle to the thought process of racism.

Cmon mates dont start a fight between yourselves. We arteta haters have to be united

Qwiss! wrote:

Asterix wrote:

I've got this image of Neil from the Young Ones in my mind now. Although that was a good show.

 

So is Jones Rick or Vyvyan?

Bit of both  ;D

AAStyle- wrote:

Cmon mates dont start a fight between yourselves. We arteta haters have to be united

I don't 'hate' Arteta, just think he's the wrong man at the wrong time, and a cop out by KSE as a ready made fall guy.  

Anzac wrote:

AAStyle- wrote:

Cmon mates dont start a fight between yourselves. We arteta haters have to be united

I don't 'hate' Arteta, just think he's the wrong man at the wrong time, and a cop out by KSE as a ready made fall guy.  

I was kidding hah. I believe that no one here hates him personally, he is just grossly incompetent to be our coach

he looked pretty unbothered today. guess the club is letting him play through until there's any developments in the situation

Don't think the club can suspend him if he isn't convicted.

Also, is there proof that that is actually his phone number?

Can't really comment of what he's guilty of from what I've read, but it doesn't look good I have to say. That whole thread makes for very uncomfortable reading. At the very least the guy is a moron.