jones wrote:
Honestly I thought when it comes to racism I've seen a bit but this is some wild shit 😆 not that I didn't believe God knows how many whites felt that way but why does everyone all of a sudden feel the urge to compare beautiful Ukrainians to the savage negroes and Musulmans where it's not just common but expected for them to die in wars.
It's sad to me, the intuitive response is surely the other way round, to ask why this support, this humane journalism haven't been offered in the cases of Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Sudan and more? And the answer is clear: those were either the west's wars or not its problem … but since that answer's too reflective, they will search for a different rationale with terms like "civilisation", or talk about "peoples not used to conflict" … the contradictions of this ideology are repellent, especially considering their human cost.
There have been reports, I'm not sure how accurate, of African Ukrainian citizens getting turned back at the Polish border while white Ukrainians pass. Even if not accurate, the admission of refugees from Ukraine sits alongside the building of border walls and detention facilities.
Around the time of the 2015 "migrant crisis" it seemed like white identity politics had metastasised at the EU level. You had key documents like Macron's "open letter to Europe" dwelling on "unity", borders and security, while Frontex had been militarised and headquartered in chauvinist Poland, Triton had been converted into a turnbacks operation and the EU had set up that evil body swap deal with Turkey to try to make it worthless for refugees to cross the Aegean seeking asylum.
This was all happening at the time the identitarian movement was setting up or expanding its parties in many European countries, based on the theories of people like the French New Right.
The way it seems to work there's an incremental rationalisation of the rollout of policy and ideology with an effective racism embedded in its universalism in the EU. The rollout comes from the liberal centre, but concedes ground to what's compatible across Europe's far right constituencies: racism, Islamophobia and a "Fortress Europe" outlook.
The bits about "Will our border be at Calais or Greece?" that preceded the Brexit vote show how chauvinist and centrifugal politics in the EU pull the supra-state position to the right. Perhaps this problem could have a different format today if twenty years ago Brussels had been able to find an accord with Turkey and accept its interest in EU membership in the period before AKP rule. At the time questions like Turkey's unwillingness to acknowledge the Armenian Genocide were raised, but now Turkey's a dictatorship which is losing its secular history.