Caligula wrote:

asajoseph wrote:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/m/man_utd/9401933.stm

The only Man Utd player I've ever actually liked.

This guy's incredible.

The weird thing for me is that even though I recognize his ability as a footballer and the quality of his character, I can never really like him simply due to THAT goal he scored against us. Every time I see the fool, I remember the run and... damn him!

That was Bergkamp's fault, the bastard!

I like Scholes as well.

Nah. There's only so much love to go around.

Though I do appreciate his penalty miss...

So you reserve it for the guy who scored THAT goal against us? Bah!

Legend to the game but he comes across as a mardy cunt IMO.

Spurs losing. Let's hope this ends in a loss for them.

Spurs 3-0 down

aaaaaaaand there goes the entire away section. Classic. Wish them nothing but good times on their six hour drive home this evening.

Get in!

Blackpool away isn't it? Holloway you legend! If only he had held on against ManU the other week too. And we still have to go there, better be up for that one.

Tomorrow let's make the gap 9 points.

Out of curiosity, who do people want in that 4th spot? Chelsea or Spurs?

Chelsea, Spurs must never be in a position to win the CL.

Tony Montana wrote:

I like Scholes as well.

The "old Jack Wilshere" eh.....
I hated the little fucker because he was just like those tenacious pint sized ginger bastards who kept trying to nick the ball off you at school.
And of course because he played for them.....

Would have loved him if he played for us like Flamini.

Caligula wrote:

Out of curiosity, who do people want in that 4th spot? Chelsea or Spurs?

That's easy, Chelsea

Chelsea without doubt

I'd rather Spurs, actually.
Chelsea without a season in the Champions league, at a time that their spending has spiked and when they need to overhaul their squad would be a disaster. They would pull a Liverpool or Abrahmovic would likely have to test Platini's resolve to impose financial fairplay. They're a bigger threat than Spurs, who are fine in the top 4, as long as we continue to finish ahead of them.

Not overly bothered either way to be honest. Make no mistake that City are in a scrap for CL football too, they could easily finish 5th.

I'd pick Chelsea for fourth. My logic is this: Even if Chelsea finish fifth, they do have some class players in their team and have the reputation to attract top players as well. If Roman goes into overdrive, which I suspect he will, they'll be back into it in no time, despite the season without Champions League.

Spurs, on the other hand, can become a dangerous outfit, with the addition of a couple of good players and they'll spend for sure if they are in the Champions League again. However, if they don't qualify, it will be very hard for them to retain their good players or get stronger players in to get back into the top four fold. Basically, they'll be out of it. for good and I'll definitely prefer that.

I didn't apply any logic at all when picking Chelsea over Spurs for fourth.
Pure emotional response.
Though I see the logic in what you say ILYAW.