goon like I said in the match thread, the ball was not stationary so couldn't have been taken even Rice didn't touch it there. On top of that it wasn't even from the correct position which would make it a wrong restart, not to mention the fact that there was no one where he supposedly wanted to take it quickly to.
You know what's even worse, that I only just realised after watching it again? The ball is in all likelihood already in play when Rice touched. Take a closer look. Veltman fell over on the ball which made it stationary. He then kicked it onto Rice's heels which effectively restarted play. If we want arguments about the the letter of the law, then the ball is actually in play meaning Rice nicked the ball before he was kicked. Fuck these bent refs.