Premier League 24/25
- Edited
QuincyAbeyie or were you saying we were better than the invincibles?
When people were saying this I couldn't believe it. At least I couldn't believe it on here, its the sort of insane take you get from 15 year old Americans on twitter or reddit.
RocktheCasbah Things may not be brilliant, as Qwiss said yesterday, but they're far from bad.
This is true. However we are football fans and if you are not winning everything all the time the natural inclination is to try and think about ways we can improve. I don't think we need to be more like Liverpool, I do think we need more in attack and to let the proverbial handbrake a bit more often but as I've said the last few days only a little. We don't need a major shift in philosophy, just nudge. Just throw a tiny bit more caution to the wind. Like when Ode was out Nwaneri should have started a few. Even like this Palace game, Havertz in midfield has his own flaws but the sight of 2 attacking mids ahead of Partey was a very welcome sight. I think had we done the same against Everton we'd have won that too and the vibes here right now would be a lot more rosey.
I don't think Liverpool are all that amazing at all. And I don't even think they are better than us. I think its impressive that Slots come in and got them slightly improve rather than go backwards as I thought they might but I also think they've had everything go their way so far this season until very recently. And I think with Konate being their first major bit of bad luck this season its shown how fragile their form actually is. Their draws with Fulham and Newcastle were an opportunity we failed to capitalise on but they did slip up. Even in this games vs Spurs they conceded 3 goals. that 8 goals conceded in 3 games. You wont see us doing to that. Eventually that sort of weakness at the back catches you out. The only question is whether we can capitalise when it does, so far the answers been no. Until the Everton game I was pretty confident we'd catch them and even yesterday I still felt we might but without Saka I really think we need a Dubai style shift in form to do it.
Qwiss these current teams are probably all physically better than the invincibles. But the invincibles are relatively better than them when compared to their peers. It’s always helpful to clarify what you are comparing. In any case, people will be talking about the invincibles in 2073. They won’t be talking about us or Man City.
"physically better than the invincibles" no offence Claudius but what does this rot even mean? I kind of feel like I've snapped because I've been reading a lot of quackery in online sports discourse over the last few years.
Those Arsenal players were supreme athletes. Tall, fast, strong and skilful. Top footballers have been eking out max performance for 30+ years now and human physiology has not changed in that time. Footballers in the Invincibles era ran, on average, just as much as players do now. Check the statistics. In 2005, midfielders were averaging 10-12km per game, pretty much identical to what midfielders are averaging now.
I've seen people mention advances in """"sports medicine"""" as the reason the best footballers are now, apparently, physically superior to the best ones from 20 years ago. It's nonsense. There is no beetroot juice, badger stem cell therapy, eye of newt, watermelon tarts, multivitamins, grandma's potion that can improve the physicality of an already supremely honed athlete by 10 - 20%.
The scientifically proven advances in sports science have come in areas like data capture, injury diagnosis, recovery and... doping.
This isn't proving your point. In that study, footballers are not covering more distance, but between 2010 and 2012, had different locomotive patterns (more sprints but more periods of very slow play brought on by fatigue).
The study is limited anyway because it analysed almost 500 players simultaneously. Another focusing on the country's top four/six teams would've been useful to see if the change was as obvious among the cream. My guess is 'no'. The cream of the athletic crop - whether in 2000, 2020 or 2040, are built different and will squeeze out every last bit of performance humanly possible.
We have data for the distance covered by high level players back in 2005 and data for distance covered by high level players today. There is no startling difference.
Another 2 minute search. I’m sure someone with research paper access can find more. But it’s also about looking with with your eyes
https://www.port.ac.uk/news-events-and-blogs/news/elite-footballers-leaner-taller-faster-than-decades-ago
Watch Liverpools counter attacks this season , the key is numbers getting forward from deep positions with a lot of space between those runners , two are always wider , stretching the defensive width and creating space . We on the other hand are breaking much closer together or only have two players running into danger areas so all the defense we are up against cluster on the area we pass the ball to initially . So we have to stop or slow the momentum and that kills the counter
Stay humble.
- Edited
He’s only 20 so I don’t want to be too critical, but Savinho is yet another example of why 15 mins of form isn’t enough to form any conclusions on a player.
When you think about prime Sterling, Sane, Mahrez and look at City now with Doku, Savinho and Grealish, it’s not really that much of a surprise that they’ve ended up where they are.
Doku is crap.
Maybe a draw against Everton isn’t the sackable offence we thought it was
Surely Pep has to be on sack watch soon.
- Edited
Claudius no result in isolation is a sackable offense, that would be silly.
Regardless, City aren't the team to beat so comparing with their results won't help us.
This is the worst recruitment phase we've seen from City during the Mansour era. Either there's a shrinking market, it's more difficult to consistently identify talent, it's a coin toss as to whether players are successful or not, or a combination of them all.
Word flying around that Liverpool game could be postponed if it fails a pitch inspection, would be great if true.
I feel like the only thing Pedro Neto has done this season is score a long range missile against us. Fuck him
Shouldn't that be sent to Var , penalty for Fulham? Robinson fluffed the chance but wasn't Jimenez trod on off the ball?
What a goal by Palmer
Hate Chelsea, but love the player