yeah, please no posts from right wing drivel accounts managed by 'team trump'. things are bad enough as it is

    QuincyAbeyie I don't recall posting this video? I just typed it into twitter search and the first one that came up I put it here.

    You probably won't get left leaning Twitter users posting the above so sorry to disappoint you and not have a user with a cover photo that you'd approve of.

    Gazza M yeah, please no posts from right wing drivel accounts managed by 'team trump'. things are bad enough as it is

    Unfortunately things are so partisan at the moment only the looney users will post shit like that.

    Gurgen Trump is winning isn’t he? Jesus H Christ what a mess. Between this and the alt right incels winning elections in Europe, some bleak years are ahead.

    Can't see anything else at the moment , he's basically taken over the Republican party and got them under his control. The cranks are in charge there now!

    Democrats are terrified of him and seem to think only Biden can beat him, only problem is Biden needs to be put in a care home not the white house! Like flobaba said, Biden's advisors/handlers more interested in keeping him in power than thinking of the country.

    It's not even that good a line ffs

      You are right, losing my memory in old age!

      FEBravo It's not even that good a line ffs

      That's the thing, which one of her aides is telling her to keep saying it! I think I understand what she is trying to say

      I saw her in a congressional hearing and she really went for the guy, I remember at the time thinking she's quite on it but fuck me since then she has come across as just being thick. Even in the debates she was dreadful. I think Biden wanted to just a woman or black woman for VP, I don't agree with that kind of stuff. Just choose who the best person is but surely he had better options?

      Think it's her line and that's why she likes it. No one can convince her it's shit.

        It’s just the gratuitous pandering. She is saying in African American street parlance that she is experiencing / witnessing things same as everyday folk. They are trying to get foolish black people to support Biden because his VP, is like “us”, unlike the vaguely alluded to “they”. It’s trying. It’s trying too hard to be clever and “black”.

        For me, it’s grating and insulting. But I’m not African American. Perhaps they can associate.

        FEBravo that’s the thing right. If she had half a brain cell she would let them know they would have to kill her first before getting her lips to utter those words, or talk like that. She has zero authenticity and zero personality, and worst of all zero self awareness. It’s unbelievable how she made it so far in life.

        If one wants "just" a black woman, I'm quite convinced there are better candidates out there. Kind of an insult to black women to think Kamala is the pick of the litter.

        i find it insulting that people think there has been an "overreaction" to the last batch of SCOTUS cases. they have basically laid the groundwork to dismantle the federal government. my girlfriend is a lawyer who works closely on agency related projects, and her entire organization is basically assuming their group won't exist at all in 6 months.

        The GOP’s triumphant attitude is neither premature nor overconfident. Four months out from November, the party has abruptly prevailed in many of its most important political battles, albeit in the cold, technical prose—you might even call it “bloodless”—of judicial opinions. The Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority has, in recent weeks, restructured American democracy in the Republican Party’s preferred image, fundamentally altering the balance of power between the branches and the citizens themselves. As the GOP became the party of coup denialism and unreconstructed Trump cultists, so too, finally, have the sober movement conservatives at the high court.

        In the course of its most recent term that conservative supermajority has created a monarchical presidency, awarding the chief executive near-insurmountable immunity from accountability for any and all crimes committed during a term in office. It has seized power from Congress, strictly limiting lawmakers’ ability to write broad laws that tackle the major crises of the moment. And it has hobbled federal agencies’ authority to apply existing statutes to problems on the ground, substituting the expert opinions of civil servants with the (often partisan) preferences of unelected judges. All the while, the court has placed itself at the apex of the state, agreeing to share power only with a strongman president who seeks to govern in line with the conservative justices’ vision

        ///

        To grasp the gobsmacking scope of this shift, start with Monday’s decision on presidential immunity and work backwards. In Trump v. U.S., the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority invented a new rule out of whole cloth, unmoored from any known constitutional text or principle, handing the president almost total immunity from criminal charges for his actions in office. Chief Justice John Roberts’ opinion purported to distinguish between “official acts,” which can’t be punished, and “unofficial acts,” which can. But Roberts also stacked the deck in favor of the president at every turn: He barred prosecutors from introducing evidence of “official acts” to prove culpability for “unofficial acts” and prohibited any inquiry into the president’s motives when “dividing official and unofficial conduct.” The result is a vast shield against prosecution that will hamstring prosecutors at every turn even if they decide that it’s somehow worth it to try to surmount the hurdle of immunity and attempt to reach the trial stage. Under this new dynamic, most prosecutors likely won’t even bother, no matter how horrific a president’s criminal actions may be.

        ///

        Shortly before handing down Trump v. U.S., the court issued Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, overturning a four-decade-old ruling that served as the basis for some 18,000 lower court decisions. Loper Bright abolished Chevron deference, the rule that federal courts should defer to agencies’ reasonable interpretations of ambiguous laws. By doing so, it seriously curbed Congress’ latitude to enact laws that address a serious problem then allow agencies to fill in the details and gaps. The ruling does not, as its defenders on the right like to insist, simply force Congress to “do its job.” Rather, it overrides lawmakers’ prerogative to exercise legislative power in a way they believe is necessary to protect the people from harms. It enshrines into law a specific conservative conception of proper government, overriding Congress’ choices without any constitutional mandate. And, of course, it replaces the opinions of agency experts with the political proclivities of life-tenured judges who may lack the most basic grasp of the facts. For good measure, the same conservative supermajority then erased a statute of limitations that might have staunched the coming tsunami of challenges to federal regulations.

        Loper Bright boils down to a straightforward proposition: The Supreme Court’s Republican appointees are sympathetic to wealthy individuals and corporations, so they will contort the law to help them. That’s the story of other key decisions this term. In SEC v. Jarkesy, the conservative justices sabotaged agencies’ ability to bring civil penalties against lawbreakers, devastating their enforcement powers across the board. In Ohio v. EPA, they let polluters block vital environmental protections by second-guessing regulators’ scientific judgment. In Snyder v. U.S., they let local officials accept bribes from wealthy benefactors in the form of (wink-wink) “gratuities.” In Moore v. U.S., they deployed gratuitous rhetoric to preemptively stack the deck against a future wealth tax. In Garland v. Cargill, they let the gun industry continue making bank off de facto machine guns. Meanwhile, the court declared open season on the rights of everyone else: racial minorities, immigrants and their families, the homeless and disabled, women in need of emergency abortions—all were denied legal protections bestowed by the Constitution and Congress this term.

        https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2024/07/supreme-court-maga-john-roberts-trump-handmaiden.html

          mdgoonah41 they have basically laid the groundwork to dismantle the federal government

          The corporatists did that long ago. Democrats laid the groundwork so that they could run against the boogeyman, and now we will all reap what they've sown. Why didn't they codify any of these judicial rulings? Why didn't they do their fucking jobs and write and pass actual laws to make these interpretations moot? Because they are knowingly complicit in the corporations' war against people. They thrive on it. They get rich off it. MAGA was created by democrats masquerading as the left.

          It really does feel like the end of the US empire. Funny how quickly systems can self destruct.

            Would be quite fitting really. US bullshit politics (in the Harry Frankfurt sense) as a function of the bullshit machine or ulterior text generator.

            Gurgen Nothing lasts forever but I don't think it is the end just yet. Definitely a decline happening in US and much more so in Europe.

            Well it seems the very checks and balances that made the US political system an efficient force once are being obliterated by corrupted folks who are primarily focused on waging a culture war.

              Gurgen Well it seems the very checks and balances that made the US political system an efficient force once are being obliterated by corrupted folks who are primarily focused on waging a culture war.

              True, I think sometimes people need to get these shit people in, which then brings about hard times and then they come to their senses and normality returns. As they say it's just a phase!

              What both sides of the political spectrum don't get is they are both as bad as each other.

                Gurgen running out of external threats then turning on eachother is textbook end of empires stuff really