Clrnc wrote: Claudius wrote: Would you pay £28-35m for Guendouzi? Just look at the Guendouzi thread 2 years ago. People were thinking of 40m for him when a lot of clubs were interested and he was first choice here running games. Anyway Sancho is absolutely bloody quality. Don't let Southgate foolishness con you, he will be worth every penny for United and bring them up another level. Sancho + Fernandes is pretty darn good, could even unlock Pogba.
Claudius wrote: Would you pay £28-35m for Guendouzi?
Would you pay £28-35m for Guendouzi?
Just look at the Guendouzi thread 2 years ago. People were thinking of 40m for him when a lot of clubs were interested and he was first choice here running games.
Anyway Sancho is absolutely bloody quality. Don't let Southgate foolishness con you, he will be worth every penny for United and bring them up another level. Sancho + Fernandes is pretty darn good, could even unlock Pogba.
Nothing can unlock Pogba. He isn't able to play well over an extended period of time.
If you could get Pogba to keep signing 6 month contracts he'd be amazing.
Apparently Grealish is close to joining City for £100m.
Puts those Maddison vs Grealish arguments into a bit of context.
Puts all transfer fees into a bit of context.
Yeah. That's that then. Grealish will similarly transform City into more dynamic if they aren't already. We are not at the level, Madison is the best we can get
goon wrote: Apparently Grealish is close to joining City for £100m. Puts those Maddison vs Grealish arguments into a bit of context.
Definitely. Those who don't think Grealish is the better player should see what the big boys do. And the people who wouldn't do a straight swap with ESR just said no to a 100m bid.
Quincy Abeyie wrote: goon wrote: Apparently Grealish is close to joining City for £100m. Puts those Maddison vs Grealish arguments into a bit of context. Definitely. Those who don't think Grealish is the better player should see what the big boys do. And the people who wouldn't do a straight swap with ESR just said no to a 100m bid.
😆
Grealish is a game changer
Gonna be the new Mahrez I reckon.
Klaus wrote: Gonna be the new Mahrez I reckon.
The one thing I can say is it’s strange in the same way that it was strange that Pep bid for Alexis Sanchez when he was at City. These aren’t pass and go players. These are running backs. So will be interesting to see how Grealish flows with the City offense
I've always said I prefer Grealish.
You reckon City would have swapped Foden for Grealish if they didn't have the money?
Sadly I think Grealish will be great for City. He's very comfortable playing in tight spaces and looks very secure in possession to me.
Let’s just get Maddison, Goon. What we know is that City will always make moves to update their team every summer. They’re so strong that most moves are marginal. We have to focus on what we can do to chip away at that gap between us and then. And not worry so much about their moves.
mahrez was a very good buy
grealish was always out of our reach. I don't think it's close between him and maddison, and the price tags reflect that
If Bernardo Silva is for sale, we should be trying.
goon wrote: Quincy Abeyie wrote: Definitely. Those who don't think Grealish is the better player should see what the big boys do. And the people who wouldn't do a straight swap with ESR just said no to a 100m bid. I've always said I prefer Grealish. You reckon City would have swapped Foden for Grealish if they didn't have the money?
Quincy Abeyie wrote: Definitely. Those who don't think Grealish is the better player should see what the big boys do. And the people who wouldn't do a straight swap with ESR just said no to a 100m bid.
Foden is not ESR. 😆 no matter what it's outrageous to say you won't swap ESR for Grealish
Tambourine Man wrote: If Bernardo Silva is for sale, we should be trying.
would give him the number 10 spot in a heartbeat, certainly ahead of maddison
Clrnc wrote: goon wrote: I've always said I prefer Grealish. You reckon City would have swapped Foden for Grealish if they didn't have the money? Foden is not ESR. 😆 no matter what it's outrageous to say you won't swap ESR for Grealish
goon wrote: I've always said I prefer Grealish. You reckon City would have swapped Foden for Grealish if they didn't have the money?
When ESR is a [size=x-small]ballon d'or [/size]contender in 2-3 years I will take no mercy on you.
Quincy Abeyie wrote: goon wrote: Apparently Grealish is close to joining City for £100m. Puts those Maddison vs Grealish arguments into a bit of context. And the people who wouldn't do a straight swap with ESR just said no to a 100m bid.
And the people who wouldn't do a straight swap with ESR just said no to a 100m bid.
goon wrote: Clrnc wrote: Foden is not ESR. 😆 no matter what it's outrageous to say you won't swap ESR for Grealish When ESR is a [size=x-small]ballon d'or [/size]contender in 2-3 years I will take no mercy on you.
Clrnc wrote: Foden is not ESR. 😆 no matter what it's outrageous to say you won't swap ESR for Grealish
Your resolve might be tested in no time soon. Twitter rumours that Villa is coming back with a 40m bid for ESR soon to replace Grealish
Gazza M wrote: Tambourine Man wrote: If Bernardo Silva is for sale, we should be trying. would give him the number 10 spot in a heartbeat, certainly ahead of maddison
Without the shadow of a doubt. He's a dickhead but we just got two in Ceballos and Willian so let's at least add some quality to our Fascist FC
