flobaba wrote:
He did not say or imply that Daryl Morey should “shut up and do your job”. That’s such a strange take on his view and an unnecessary twist of his words. He explicitly stated that he did not believe the man was educated enough on the issue before he spoke. And he granted that the man had the right to speak, but should have been conscious of the possible ramifications and repercussions.
How is this a shut up and dribble / do your job parallel?
It's just how I see it. And by the looks of it, I'm not the only one that sees it that way.
He has the right to speak but should be carfuel what he says if it affects their income - that's what I get from that. Let's be honest is not like he posted something super controversial or wrong. Be carfuel what you speak or twitt? Come on, his new nike campaign "invites wearers to share their voice"(launched this week, funny that). That's what the guy thinks, so is it ok or not to share his voice?
Isnt it so that free speech means being able to say what you think, even if it's not right ? So in Bron's view the problem here is what he posted and not how the Chinese gouverment reacts to any tiny thing that people say that might not be in line with the views that they have?
