Lol. She is often a tad more dramatic than necessary.

As an aside I think that’s one of the reasons why the country and it’s politics has become so polarized. The preponderance of opinion “news” shows rather than actual factual information has everyone pointing to their own trusted sources and nothing can dissuade them from whatever they are convinced is the “truth”. From Hannity to Tucker Carlson (still can’t believe that guy is actually on TV), to Rachel and Brian Williams. Alternative facts are everywhere.

I'd share that view. Rolling news as infotainment vying with reality TV for the same audience.
LCD.

It's always bothered me that when we use the lowest common denominator as a metaphor for the reduction of multiple terms into merely what they hold in common, we should really be using the highest common factor. That's my electric contribution.

Struggling to believe that this is an actual article:

Billionaire Michael Bloomberg throws his hat in the race.

Fun times.

21 days later

Being against the banking industry and Israeli settler colonialism is the same as antisemitism, while Nazism is just the result of middle class frustrations at being "left behind" in the #MeToo SJW era we suffer in.

Haven't you heard?

4 days later

A Muslim moderator on the national stage. Phew.

😆 brilliant. Bloomberg-bezos buddy buddy.

a month later

I think bernie probably did say something along those lines e.g. it will be tougher for a female candidate to beat trump. The media trying to twist this to mean bernie is a raging sexist is unsurprising. They suggested he was a sexist in 2016 as well, and an anti-semite. I remember harvey weinstein went on cnn during the 2016 primaries to accuse bernie of being sexist

He campaigned for her for ages. Did 30 something rallies for her, she did less than 10 for Obama when he beat her the primaries. Now she's out slating him. The Clintons are evil psychos anyway.

At least Trump's honest in his intentions to fuck everyone over.

jones wrote:

https://heavy.com/news/2020/01/i-like-bernie-trends-hillary-clinton/?

😆 pardon my trash language but she's so ridiculously easy to despise. Like a comic book villain

this is the kind of thing that usually results in spikes in bernie's fundraising/poll numbers. the bubble the clintons operate in as a result of controlling mainstream media for so long makes them really out touch. probably genuinely baffled when they get backlash for this stuff

Gazza M wrote:
jones wrote:

https://heavy.com/news/2020/01/i-like-bernie-trends-hillary-clinton/?

😆 pardon my trash language but she's so ridiculously easy to despise. Like a comic book villain

this is the kind of thing that usually results in spikes in bernie's fundraising/poll numbers. the bubble the clintons operate in as a result of controlling mainstream media for so long makes them really out touch. probably genuinely baffled when they get backlash for this stuff

"Absolutely no one I met in Little St. James says they like Bernie"

The Democrats are fools if they don't go for Bernie.

I think he's the only one who can beat Trump, and they have been claiming that above all else that's what this election is about.

I think that Trump won't be able to hurt Bernie 1 v 1.
He's not going to have any dirt on him.

I think so too Y va. Above all I think that, if it comes down to an election, Sanders will be able to swing both independent voters and conservatives who have gotten disillusioned by the inherent corruption in Washington politics. A lot of Democrats never stopped and considered that when Trump yelled about draining the swamp it was actually something that needed to be done. He did the exact opposite of course, he filled it with more alligators instead, but he could pretend to be for change in Washington because change was needed in the first place. It seems to me that we're living in fundamentally dishonest times of corporate lobbyism and corporate media. If MSNBC is any better than Fox News nowadays we're talking about small nuances of grey, and you can say the same about the Democrats and the GOP for the most part, a few (mostly) young progressives excluded.

People who live in small towns without health care and have to work two or three jobs for basic income see Hillary Clinton make millions off giving closed door speeches to Wall Street banks, where reassurances about regulations and taxes are quietly being made, and they don't see a person who's fundamentally different than any other millionaire. They see Joe Biden and they're reminded of how he's so close to credit banking and the predatory lending industry that he used to joke about how the banks were the real senator from his home state.

I watched a clip from one of Bernie's Fox News town hall appearances, and he got huge rounds of applause from hardcore republicans because he spoke at length about what they have in common rather than about their disagreements. At the end of the day they don't want their medicare taken away either, they don't want lesser funds to education, they want veterans taken care of instead of being left homeless on the streets, and they all agree that millionaires and companies should pay much higher taxes than they currently do. They want better conditions for both workers and small business owners, instead of laws that either hand out breaks to the big and mighty or put the financial burden on the wrong party. Neoliberals never seem to get this. It's the same in virtually every country. They think of themselves as champions of the working people and then seem dumbfounded when the working class doesn't vote for them.

I know someone whose family run a small Feed 'n Seed store in South Carolina. Like a lot of small business owners they pay an obscene amount of money each year for health insurance since there are no more options in the marketplace. It's so symptomatic of the way things are done in Washington. You take one good idea - healthcare should be affordable to everyone - and then you water it down and compromise it until Obamacare comes out the other side. Instead of reforming the system with a single payer on top you push the problem on the insurance industry.

Bernie has been complaining about these things for fifty years without toeing any party line, and I reckon there's value in that kind of consistency to people on both sides of the spectrum. If they start to believe that they actually want the same things and just have a different method of how to achieve them then Sanders becomes a serious option to Trump. You can't say the same about any other current Democrat really. They all hold positions on banking, climate, taxes and medicare that you feel they'll compromise with (or outright abandon) to various degrees.

NY Times is still at it:

The term "moderates" is just propaganda too. Whats moderate about Joe Biden or Mayo Pete compared to Bernie?

Moderate means doesn’t promise much and really won’t try too hard to do anything.

7 days later

Thats brilliant. I love watching these psychos humiliating each other.

What's up with this fiasco in Iowa with the app?

Is the DNC is trying to rig the results or what 😆

Bernie and buttigieg camps both claiming victories based on their internal figures

Seems biden was the flop of day. Tracking to finish 4th behind bernie, pete, and liz.

Yeah seems like the only thing everyone agrees on is that Biden finished a distant 4th. Don't think he was expecting much in Iowa though, from what I understand he'll be all about Super Tuesday.

This Iowa issue is a great example of how dysfunctional American politics is, and how media and social media play an incredibly destructive role. A lot of my American friends were using words like 'disaster' and 'Dems in disarray', and then I looked to see that CNN had filled the absence of results with a nothing story about a delay, and people had gone into meltdown on twitter.

When you actually took 10 seconds to look at the circumstances, the underlying integrity of the election was fine, and results were just going to be a bit delayed. Nothing to get excited about in an election that was going to contribute a fraction of a percent of the delegates. But there are stories up online about how this hands Trump an advantage because his opponents are in disorder. What, homie?

Imagine being a "journalism professor" and not knowing what oligos means. The absolute state of that clown.

Claudius wrote:

This Iowa issue is a great example of how dysfunctional American politics is, and how media and social media play an incredibly destructive role. A lot of my American friends were using words like 'disaster' and 'Dems in disarray', and then I looked to see that CNN had filled the absence of results with a nothing story about a delay, and people had gone into meltdown on twitter.

When you actually took 10 seconds to look at the circumstances, the underlying integrity of the election was fine, and results were just going to be a bit delayed. Nothing to get excited about in an election that was going to contribute a fraction of a percent of the delegates. But there are stories up online about how this hands Trump an advantage because his opponents are in disorder. What, homie?

I was reading a Beeb article and analysis taking about what a massive disaster this is, apparently a far bigger disaster than Bernie potentially winning. 

They didn't qualify the analysis with any real reasoning, I think the best they managed was that it might create a few conspiracy theories. Seems to me that they only reason it's a disaster for the dems is because the media say it is. 

Klaus wrote:

Imagine being a "journalism professor" and not knowing what oligos means. The absolute state of that clown.

Its because oligarchs are only supposed to be rich foreigners, rich Americans are job creators who deserve their money.

Listening to how he pronounces it he probably thinks it's spelled oilygarch

Well, here's the initial results.

buttigieg put alot of effort into iowa, and had a bit more facetime compared with the senators who were on impeachment duty

still think sanders will edge it when 100% of the precincts report

So Sanders has the most votes but Buttigieg ends up with the most delegates so far. How can Americans fail so badly at elections?

Some delegates literally being decided through coin tosses and by names being picked out of a hat 😆

The whole country is such a nuthouse.

Nothing about the caucus makes sense.
You have this process that gets a really small number of people to vote. And then you could end up with three winners depending on how the votes pan out per district. I and all this fuss for a state that only delivers a fraction of a percent of required delegates.

This is shaping up to be a bad week for the Democrats. I think the pendulum is shifting back towards Trump, he’s about to be cleared in congress and his approval ratings seem to be going up. The impeachment case looks like it is about to backfire and the Democrats put a lot of their eggs in that basket. They always knew it would never get past congress but public opinion has not gone the way they thought. Then you got this farce in Iowa and generally a very split party. There’s not a single candidate who looks like they can unite both sides.