Gotta give them credit for learning from their mistakes though. That's the one thing no other Arsenal side has ever managed to do since. Like in 02/03 when Wenger talked about going invincble and they ended up bottling the leage run-in so badly, only to then actually pull off an invincible season the next year. Or when they got schooled by Inter in Champions League, took it on the chin, threw a few punches on the training ground, and then went down to San Siro and beat them as badly as they've ever been beaten at home in their entire club history. Or how they lost the FA Cup in 01 to two late Owen goals and then came back and not only won it in 2002 but went on to set the most FA Cups record.

If we had managed to keep the team together and maybe had a bit better luck with injuries they would probably have come back to win Champions League too after losing the final to Barca, or even pulled it off right away in 05/06.

I think that attitude comes from having a bit of arrogance about you as a team. In the league and cups we knew we were the best and we played like it. In Europe it was different, the arrogance wasn't there except in isolated bursts.

It's why I think compensating for a teams weaknesses is a losing strategy. You're automatically in a negative mindset. I reckon it's why Wenger lost some of his magic. He was constantly looking to ways to balance the team, playing the likes of Coq and Flamini in the same midfield, 5 at the back etc. Would have never happened under him in the earlier years, in the past if he wasn't winning he'd just throw on four strikers.

Invincibles played in a CL where patience was more of a virtue. Teams that made it to the late stages in the 2000s generally played a slower controlled game, often combined with tight defending. That arsenal team got outmaneuvered often by valencia, deportivo, and imo would've struggled with jose's porto, or ancelottis milan. Vieira also struggled with the midfield compositions in the CL, which were rarely 442. Then you add the well documented thin squad and tactical naivete, and its not surprising that team flattered to deceive

Even in the epl they used to struggle painfully with a lack of plan b. Bolton games were excruciating everytime.

We only started being better in UCL when we played 451. We were too open with our 442 and in those days the football level in Europe is much higher than England's gungho long ball direct approach. Even smaller teams like Deportivo or eastern european teams gave us plenty of problems.

5 days later

Why is an Arsene Wenger thread in the Other Football section?

For the same reason the "Former Arsenal players" thread is here.

I think Jazz has a point. Rabble like Hleb can have their news in this section, but anything related to people like Wenger and Henry belongs in Arsenal talk.

I don't care much either way, but to answer the question again, it's probably because there's a lot of people between Hleb and Wenger and it's easiest to draw the line at everyone. also, if Henry, say, is fired from the Montreal job it doesn't necessarily seem logical for it to be a topic in the Arsenal part of the forum, while if you want to talk about his past we have the Arsenal Reminisce thread.

5 days later

On waterstones there is a promotion now - today only I think, on Wenger's book - My Life in Red and White - that comes out in the fall, 20 pounds for pre order and get this, it comes signed by the man himself.

Thanks for the tip, genuinely can't wait to read this.

HomeSteak wrote:

On waterstones there is a promotion now - today only I think, on Wenger's book - My Life in Red and White - that comes out in the fall, 20 pounds for pre order and get this, it comes signed by the man himself.

Really hopeful this book will actually resolve the greatest mystery of our time—Park Chu-Young.

Thanks! I see that its 17 pounds now?

Edit: Nevermind, the signed edition is the 20 pounds one and its sold out ffs

It sold out yesterday when I had a look

Burnwinter wrote:
HomeSteak wrote:

On waterstones there is a promotion now - today only I think, on Wenger's book - My Life in Red and White -  that comes out in the fall, 20 pounds for pre order and get this, it comes signed by the man himself.

Really hopeful this book will actually resolve the greatest mystery of our time—Park Chu-Young.

And: "Why I went mental and signed Xhaka and Mustafi"

"Why I dropped an inform Arshavin against Chelsea in the semi final."

I think it was around that season it became harder and harder to blindly trust Wenger

@BBKG I can answer that for you. Both of which, especially Xhaka, were quite promising when we signed them.

But there were question marks over them. Xhaka wasn't the most quickest / agile and Mustafi wasn't the fastest / tallest which would be a problem in the PL.

To be fair to Wenger both players have mainly disappointed in the one aspect that is most difficult to evaluate before you sign a player. Both of them are absolutely houseboat mentally. Xhaka is the most erratic midfielder I've seen at Arsenal; he even makes Flamini look cool and composed. And Mustafi goes to pieces every time he makes a mistake, which is well unfortunate, because he makes a lot of them.

Everyone makes signings that don't pan out. To me Wenger's real mistake was to not get rid of them sooner; Mustafi in particular because we actually fought off concrete interest to keep him against his will. He handed in a transfer request and wanted to go, Inter were willing to recuperate what we had paid for him. We could have taken that money and reinvested it and at the very least not been worse off.

I think Park Chu Young is by far the biggest mystery. We went out of a way to hijack that deal from Lille, personally convinced Park to come over and lets not forget at that time he had an impressive Ligue 1 and World Cup for Korea.

Signed him, played some rubbish players ahead of him and let him rot for years till his peak of his career is wasted 😆

2 months later

He was just asked at the half time show on bein sport about those reports. His answer is "no" full stop 😆

Then he further mentioned he was offered but he loves what he is doing at FIFA. When asked if he is to go back to management will it be in club or national team, he say it might be national team.

a month later

Here you go Clrnc:

[spoiler]When we meet at a café on Rue Faidherbe in Paris, Arsène Wenger tells me that he played football in a charity match the day before. Oh yeah, were you any good? “I was very good,” he says in that deadpan manner that became so familiar even to casual fans during his 22-year tenure (1996-2018 ) as manager of Arsenal.

“I can say that because you didn’t see me play,” he adds, undercutting the boast. Even so, tall and trim, he cannot hide the pride he takes in his enduring physical fitness. “I’m 70. I can still play football, so that’s not too bad.” Especially when the other players included Laurent Blanc, Christian Karembeu and Bixente Lizarazu, all a generation younger and sharing almost 250 French caps between them. Did his team win? “Of course. 4-1.” Did he score? “No, I played centre back.”

As a pro himself, way back, Wenger was a midfielder. He had a decent career in the French lower leagues but played just a handful of games in Ligue 1 for Strasbourg, the club he supported as a boy growing up in Alsace. Later, required to juggle a football during the photoshoot, Wenger demonstrates his technical ability. Even in his pristine smart casuals, his control in a tight space is way above average. Many of the best coaches – Wenger, Sir Alex Ferguson, Jürgen Klopp – had good but not great playing careers. Pep Guardiola, who was world class on the pitch, is an exception. In a different way so is José Mourinho, who never played professionally.

By the age of 30, while still playing, Wenger had already started coaching. After spells at smaller clubs he made his name at Monaco, winning the title there before going to work in Japan. When he arrived at his near-namesake club in north London, the headlines asked variations on the question: “Arsène who?”

Nobody was asking that just two years later, when his club won the Premier League and FA Cup double. Wenger repeated the feat in 2002 and in 2004 won the title again, this time without losing a single game. Despite continued cup success in later years and an impressive 19 consecutive qualifications for the Champions League, reaching the final in 2006, Wenger lost the support of many fans and finally left his beloved club two years ago. It was, as he admits in his new autobiography, a “very lonely, very painful” separation. He has not been back to the Emirates, Arsenal’s stadium. Not yet anyway.

“I will go one day,” he says, sipping his mineral water. Has he been invited? “Yes, but I thought it was better to cut completely. It was difficult at the start, of course, after leading my club as long as I did, but I thought it’s better to follow from a distance.”

Which he does, avidly watching every game. I ask if he’d seen the recent England v Iceland international, an unconvincing 1-0 victory. Of course he saw it. This is a man who once told reporters he would celebrate a title by watching a recording of a game in the German second division, who writes in his book that “a day without a football match seems empty to me”. His analysis of that England game? “It was bad. I’ve seen so many good players not doing well for England. They’re scared to play. Phil Foden is a guy with big quality, but at the moment he has not made it. He hasn’t played enough at Manchester City. You need about 100 games to know your job in the Premier League.”

Going back to his departure from Arsenal, he now has “no connection at all with the club”. I mention Sir Alex Ferguson who, after 26 years at Manchester United, was given a seat on the board. Why wasn’t he made a similar offer? “I don’t know. I always said I would still play a part in the club, but I could understand that at the start it’s better that we take a complete distance.” If asked, would he have accepted? “I would have done that, yes.”

The severance seems particularly ungrateful on Arsenal’s part, given Wenger became a lot more than a mere manager during his tenure. He was so careful with the club’s money that around the time of the move from Highbury to the Emirates, the bank insisted on his agreeing a new five-year contract before signing off on a loan, as if his presence was the best guarantor for the investment.

The normal reward might well have been a directorship. “Yes, but I don’t expect anything,” he says. “I’m just doing my job. As long as I’m somewhere, I give my best. I’m happy having served the club and leaving them in good hands and in good shape. Overall, I did the job at three levels: to play with style and to win; to develop players; and to develop the club worldwide. The third level today is impossible. It’s not in your hands any more.”

Maybe Klopp has that sort of power at Liverpool. Wenger is dismissive. “No, he is solely focused on the team. He doesn’t negotiate the transfers or build the stadium.” He hasn’t really stayed in touch with his contemporaries. “These people are all very busy. I’m not close enough to them . . . except [he pauses] Ferguson, yes.”

Does he have Fergie’s number in his phone? “I have Ferguson’s number, yes.” You’d know it was him calling? “Yeah, yeah.” You’re friends? “We have a lot of respect for each other now.” There was a period when you didn’t . . . “We had a period when it was very tough, very hot.” Throwing pizzas and all the rest of it? (This refers to an incident in the tunnel at Old Trafford in 2004, when Arsenal’s Cesc Fàbregas chucked a pizza from the post-match buffet and it hit the United manager.) Wenger laughs. “After you’re not competing any more, everyone becomes a bit more objective.

“He [Ferguson] knows better wine than I do,” Wenger admits, growing nostalgic. “Ah, we had some good battles. He’s an intelligent man. You don’t make a career like this guy if you’re stupid.”

As for Guardiola, the two are not in touch. But, “When Guardiola was still a player,” Wenger reveals, “he came to my home to ask to play for Arsenal. At the time I had [Patrick] Vieira, I had Gilberto Silva. I couldn’t take him.”

Living mainly in London, with homes in Paris and Zurich (where he has a role with Fifa as chief of global football development), Wenger remains an avid fan of the Premier League. “I follow every English game on television. It’s my league. We don’t need to come out from a special school to know Bayern Munich will win the championship in Germany, that Juventus will win it in Italy, that Paris Saint-Germain will win it in France. England is still the most unpredictable league in Europe, even if last year was not a good year [with Liverpool winning by such a margin] and English teams didn’t do well in Europe.”

Mention of PSG prompts him to add: “I was offered that job a few times.” And indeed Bayern, Real Madrid, Barcelona, Juventus, the France national team. How about Man Utd? “Yes,” he says. When? “I don’t tell you that.” He smiles. “But I can tell you Man Utd offered me the job.” Please tell me when. “I don’t tell you that,” he repeats more firmly.

The potential awkwardness is averted by the first of many passing fan requests for a picture. Wenger — or Monsieur Wenger as each supplicant respectfully calls him — is his usual impeccably polite and yet also slightly detached self each time. I feel bad now for calling you “Arsène”, I tell him afterwards. “That’s no problem at all,” he replies.

We go on to discuss his book. Did he write it himself? “Yes, with help, but it’s me.” It’s the first one he’s done, unusual in an age when players bring out their first memoir around the age of 24. “I’ve been asked to do it for many years,” he says. “For me it was very difficult. First of all, I don’t like to talk too much about me. And second it was saying somewhere in my head, ‘I don’t manage any more. It’s the end of my experience.’ And I don’t like that. I didn’t want to sound like I’d retired. Then I thought, OK, I do it even if it’s only for my family [he separated from his wife, Annie, in 2015; they have one daughter, Léa, 23] so they would know one day what I did in my life.”

Does he want to manage a club again? “I’m not sure.” Because when he left Arsenal, he sounded certain that he did. “Yes. For 40 years I did only that every day in my life.” Two years on, he is enjoying having more time for himself. What’s he doing? “Making some sport. Visiting my family and friends. Holidays. Reading a lot. Enjoying life but in a sensible way, because I’m a little bit drilled by 30, 40 years of discipline, you know?”

I do know, having read in his book how he gets up at 5.30am and does an hour and a half in the gym, with extra cardio if possible. Most successful people, I say, are disciplined, but you’re . . . “Super-disciplined?” he suggests. I tell him I was going to say “fanatical”. Is that fair? “Fanatical, yes.” Most of us, including the famous, would recoil from the description. But Wenger chuckles, clearly relishing it. His early start comes after only five or six hours’ sleep. His energy is prodigious. During lockdown, which he spent in Totteridge, the north London suburb he calls home, he ran “8-10k a day”.

Part of that stamina comes from a rural upbringing, roaming the fields around the village in Alsace where his parents ran a bar. He grew up speaking the Alsatian dialect and French and learnt German at school. Football dominated the bar and the village. Back then, however, the French professional game lacking the depth and structure long established in neighbouring countries, Wenger could not even dream of his future career. “I’d never seen a coach until I was 19. It is the surprise of my life to spend it in football.”

The other great influence on the young Wenger was the church. “I still have religious morality,” he says. “I still like to go to church. It’s a place where you can concentrate. I watch Mass on television sometimes, but I cannot say I am a practising Catholic. God has a huge strength: you cannot prove that he doesn’t exist. On the other hand you cannot prove he exists. Religion has been created from us. It is a way to be happy in life. God forgives you for your sins; in the future we go to paradise. We can focus on the present.”

When he first arrived in the UK, Wenger cut an unusual figure on the touchline. Dapper, ascetic, erudite, he was nicknamed the Professor by the initially sceptical old hands at Arsenal. Back in the days when neither foreign managers nor foreign players, with their more sophisticated ways, were the norm, Wenger looked suspiciously posh in the context of England’s doggedly proletarian culture. And in a way he was. He relates in his book, for instance, how when he first met Arsenal’s vice-chairman at the time, David Dein, he ended up acting out A Midsummer Night’s Dream in a game of charades at Dein’s house. Hard to imagine Big Sam Allardyce in a similar role.

Back in 1996, Wenger’s insistence on the importance of concepts such as correct nutrition, radically reduced alcohol intake, regular sleep, stretching, mental preparation and resilience of character were met with scepticism. “We want our Mars bars,” his squad would sing on the team bus. Then they started winning, and his rivals decided these newfangled notions of “invisible training” could have some merit and promptly copied them.

Ironically, all the time Wenger was trying to persuade Tony Adams, Paul Merson and co to swap booze for broccoli, he was hiding an unhealthy habit of his own: he smoked.

“Yes, for a long time I smoked. My father smoked 40 a day. I grew up in a bar full of smoke. In France, smoking is normal.” Even so, he didn’t start until he was 34. “A friend of mine was a heavy smoker. We’d sit up at night talking and I’d take one, you know? I still smoked when I came to England, one or two after dinner, no more.” Did the players know? “I don’t think so. I never smoked with the team. Nobody has ever seen me smoking.” He has long since stopped — “My daughter complaining, you know?” — but still enjoys a drink. “Good red wine, not much.”

We move on to politics, in which he takes a keen interest. Rather confusingly, he says, “I am new liberal right. I’m for freedom but certain things — health, defence — have to be controlled by the government. I like [the French president Emmanuel] Macron. He is centre. It’s very difficult to satisfy people in France. It’s difficult to govern.”

Yes, I say. Every time the government tries to change anything there’s a strike or a riot. Wenger shrugs. “I feel sorry for Macron, because he tries very hard.” He thinks the French commitment to short hours, long lunches, generous welfare, heavily subsidised agriculture and quite staggering bureaucracy is unsustainable.

“It’s like in a family,” he says, presumably unconsciously channelling Margaret Thatcher. “It’s OK as long as you can balance your budget. Until you have to pay. Then it’s not OK. With the debt we have now, we cannot continue like that, because the next generations will have to pay back. It’s not a fair way.” He thinks the German commitment to balanced budgets is the example to follow. “We behave like we want more and more no matter whether we balance our budget or not. Similarly in football.”

And what of his adopted country? “I love England. I feel sorry for England [he says that rather than Britain] because I am scared that they will suffer now [after Brexit]. You’re in a very weak position to negotiate. England has made the choice for passion and the desire for sovereignty. I can understand that, but unfortunately it was not a rational decision. I’m scared that they pay for that. Europe will have to make it hard for them or everybody will want to leave. They have no choice. I know [Michel] Barnier. He said from the first day they will be tough on England.” The irony of Brexit as regards football is, he says, “You want sovereignty, but all the English clubs are run by people who are not English.”

There’s a sense Wenger is getting over the pain of enforced separation from the club where he “knitted my soul in red and white”, as he puts it in his book. He likes his role with Fifa. “I can share what I’ve learnt in my life and hopefully be efficient in what I share,” he says. The first year was tough for other reasons too. “I lost my brother and my sister in six months. My sister had Alzheimer’s. She was not well for ten years. My brother died quite quickly.” Their loss has made him value time spent with his daughter all the more, visiting her frequently in Cambridge, where she is a research student in neuroscience.

“I would have respected my contract,” he says, looking back on his Emirates exit. “The club thought it was better I stopped. I’d always lived with the idea that could happen. The supporters were not happy any more. Some of them. You can understand that, at some stage, 22 years, people want a change.” I tell him I’d interviewed Tony Blair shortly before he stepped down in 2007, how he’d said that after ten years, people are sick of your face. “Ah, so I punished them for 12 years?” he jokes.

Does he now think he might have stayed too long? He pauses for quite a while. “Listening to that question,” he replies, “makes me think, ‘Yes.’ ” Well, that’s the consensus, isn’t it? “Maybe I stayed too long,” he admits. “I don’t know. But I was committed like on the first day. I think I guided the club through the most difficult period in a very successful way. At some stage people say you’re too old, but they don’t really look at what you do. I served the club as much as I could.”

And served it to the exclusion of pretty much everything else. “I rejected those around me,” he writes. “I did not see beauty or pleasure or relaxation.” Infamously, he did not see any on-field skulduggery by his players either. When issuing his mantra in post-match interviews that he didn’t see the sending off or penalty appeal, he now admits, “Sometimes it wasn’t true. I’m a bad loser, yes. If you’re a good loser, you don’t last a long time in this job. That’s something I had from birth. I’m still like it. If I play cards, I want to win. You know what they say,” he adds, tapping me on the arm (he is surprisingly tactile). “Women can kill for love and men because they hate to lose.”

His obsession was the reason he didn’t become a father until he was 48. “I think basically this is a job for single people. I always cherish freedom. I had girlfriends, but my priority was always football. I liked the idea to take my luggage and go anywhere in the world tomorrow. At Cannes I lived over the Bay of Villefranche; when I was in Japan [in Nagoya, not a natural beauty spot] I had a view of a wall, but I always say if I won the game it was a great view and I was happy. If happiness is liking the life one lives, I can say I have been happy, and still am.”

Wrapping up our conversation, we deal with a few miscellaneous topics. He thinks Arsenal’s latest manager, his former player and Guardiola protégé Mikel Arteta, has “got the grip back on the team. They finished well, though they had a bad Premier League. Fifty-six points!” He thinks England’s national team are looking good for the Euros next year, bestowing the ultimate seal of approval on the manager in saying “[Gareth] Southgate analyses well”. He thinks the pandemic will have no long-term deflationary effect on transfer fees, wages or the relentlessly spiralling hype around the game. “As soon as it is over, football will become mad again.” He worries, however, that “the lower leagues will die unless the elite clubs help out”.

And he also thinks that without fans, football “loses its charm. We can take the fans for granted, but they are the only thing that hasn’t changed. The players, the game, the clubs, the stadiums all change. The fans don’t. When you arrived at Highbury, on Avenell Road, you got out of the bus, you shared it with the fans. At the Emirates, you are inside, all the security, it’s not the same.”

The grand old stadium was redeveloped as flats after the club moved. Wenger seriously considered buying one. As it is, he volunteers just before we part, “I drive sometimes through Highbury. The entrance is still there, the gates are listed . . .”

And what does he feel? “I feel nostalgia,” he replies. “We had good times there.”

My Life in Red and White: My Autobiography by Arsène Wenger is published on October 13 (Weidenfeld & Nicolson, £25)[/spoiler]

Cheers Klaus! Can't wait for his book to be out

Fair play for still playing football at 70.

Thanks to Klaus for sharing.

5 days later

Wenger wants to change a few rules in football. He admits that his rule change of goalie being able to pass within 5.5m in the box has totally changed football and now everybody plays from the back and press high. Now he is considering the following:

Offside: As long as any part of your body is onside you will be onside; advantage for attackers

Corners: Outswinging corners the goes out of play and come back in will be deemed valid.

Throw Ins: Throw-ins that happen in your own half will be kick ins instead.

Freekick: You can play take a freekick to yourself.

I don't mind any of those to be honest. Maybe the freekick rule could lead to some weird situations if taken quickly though.

Clrnc wrote:

Wenger wants to change a few rules in football. He admits that his rule change of goalie being able to pass within 5.5m in the box has totally changed football and now everybody plays from the back and press high. Now he is considering the following:

Offside: As long as any part of your body is onside you will be onside; advantage for attackers

Corners: Outswinging corners the goes out of play and come back in will be deemed valid.

Throw Ins: Throw-ins that happen in your own half will be kick ins instead.

Freekick: You can play take a freekick to yourself.

He's always wanted kick ins, remember him talking about it years ago.

I like the offside rule.

Don't agree with the out swinger rule at all.

The out swinger rule sounds weird but I would love that offside change. It'd be a massive fuck you to English VAR referees and the ridiculous way they're measuring pixels too.

@ Qs!: Why not? It has no real material effect in my opinion.

flobaba wrote:

@ Qs!: Why not? It has no real material effect in my opinion.

2 reasons. I think its a bit too hard to defend a very curvy outswinger and I think if the ball is outside the confines of the pitch it should just be out. Thats a line I wouldn't like to see crossed, so to speak, as it opens the door for other weird rule changes.

Yeah, it can't just be corners then. They will have to change it completely, ball can go out and still be in play as long as it bounces in any where. It should help wide players, full backs.

I would love the offside rule changed though. We should have more goals in theory. I don't find it acceptable that a player with both feet onside can be adjudged offside if a centimetre of his shoulder is offside.

Qwiss! wrote:
Clrnc wrote:

Wenger wants to change a few rules in football. He admits that his rule change of goalie being able to pass within 5.5m in the box has totally changed football and now everybody plays from the back and press high. Now he is considering the following:

Offside: As long as any part of your body is onside you will be onside; advantage for attackers

Corners: Outswinging corners the goes out of play and come back in will be deemed valid.

Throw Ins: Throw-ins that happen in your own half will be kick ins instead.

Freekick: You can play take a freekick to yourself.

He's always wanted kick ins, remember him talking about it years ago.

Every time we played Stoke 😆

Agree with all of them except corners too.

Offside: very obvious to me. Should clearly be changed as Wenger suggests.

Corners: I actually like this. I think the ball should only be out if it's on the ground or makes contact with someone/something.

Throw Ins: This is weird and I don't like the idea of kick ins at all, seems unnecessarily convoluted.

Freekick: Very interested in this. Changes the game entirely, and for the better I think. Set plays have become very American Football if you ask me.