Tony Montana wrote:
Qwiss! wrote:
I'm hoping the bookies are fuelling the Arteta stories. I'll be really disappointed if we end up with him as manager.
Dull, uninspired, safe an easy option.
Get someone different who has no arsenal connection.
I don't see Arteta as a safe option, and certainly not an easy option
I think appointing a more established manager, whose quality is known, in the mould of Wenger--Ancelotti or Pellegrini, for example--without making sweeping changes to the personnel and structure of the coaching/medical setup, would be a much less risky approach. That continuity is in my opinion almost a guarantee that we would see an increase in our performance level and points total for next season. A sort of improved status quo, if you will.
Appointing Arteta, alongside an overhaul of our coaching/medical staff and methods, creates a much greater chance that next season our performance could be markedly worse.
I think it's fair to assume Gazidis and the other board members know very well that this season is a very important one for the club. Another season finishing outside the top four would be disastrous for our financial capability in the short-term and weaken our brand longer-term (further damaging our competitiveness financially).
The only reason for appointing Arteta and increasing the level of risk--since it is clearly not a crowd pleasing choice--is surely because there is a strong enough belief by those making the decision that Arteta has a greater upside than the safer and more popular candidates and can hit the ground running and compete with the 4 or 5 indisputably elite coaches at the clubs we are competing against. If those two beliefs aren't there then it makes no sense whatever to appoint Arteta.
I respect the courage being shown by the club in taking a risk and backing their judgment. I think it's very brave and very bold.