Riyad Mahrez: Page 6 - The Arsenal discussion community: One More in the Tolly

Riyad Mahrez

FantasticMrFox

Even if we sign Mahrez, still think we will sign a striker with one or two players leaving.

Burnwinter

Excited by this possibility, also if we sign him fuck you Jamie, we got your better teammate, and no need to install an extra shelf in the trophy cabinet.

Sánchez Giroud Mahrez isn't that bad. Definitely want us to cash in on Walcott if this happens.

Mirth

We still need a striker though - even if we have Giroud supported by Sanchez, Ozil and Mahrez, what happens if Giroud gets injured? Welbeck's out for a season and Walcott is no where near good enough.

marv3llous

We need a striker, but having Mahrez gives us leverage when shopping for a striker.

Burnwinter

No doubt. I agree we still need a centre forward to have any hope in the league, but swapping Mahrez in for Walcott would still be a big upgrade.

Let's just lock this down, I'm already dreading finding out it's all bullshit.

y va marquer

It is all bullshit.

Segway

Too good to be true.

FantasticMrFox

[font=Arial, sans-serif]Ed Aarons ‏[/font]
[size=x-small]@ed_aarons[/size]

Riyad Mahrez's agent has denied there is any interest from Arsenal in player despite reports in France today
Mahrez agent was at Arsenal v Lens last night but says it was bit connected to a transfer or talks

:brow:

Don Pacifico

Think 'bit' is an autocorrect from 'not'.

lorddulaarsenal

This is happening. That bloke's just trying to calm it down.

marv3llous

Oh, he was just "randomly" doing some other business there, yeah? Allright.

FantasticMrFox

Reckon there is something in this.

y va marquer

You guys are being played for fools by eurosport.fr

USArsenal

ill believe this when arsenal.com announce it (or the player himself)

Sicario

Mahrez and no striker or no Mahrez and no striker?

I'll go with the former.

Qwiss

After the Vardy saga I'm not buying into anything yet.

Would be very happy with Mahrez and Icardi though. Which is probably why it's unlikely.

marv3llous

USArsenal wrote:
ill believe this when arsenal.com announce it (or the player himself)

Think you should be more careful tbh. Wouldnt trust it even then, myself.

marv3llous

Sicario wrote:
Mahrez and no striker or no Mahrez and no striker?

I'll go with the former.

In real life there are no such choices though.

In real life we're starting with Walcott. No striker, no Mahrez :egg:

FantasticMrFox

Klaus doesnt approve.

marv3llous

😆

« Previous Page Next Page »