The worst argument I've ever heard is that "La lifa is easier to do it in, so Messi isn't the best ever"
Erm... this isn't some chump doing it in La Liga and falling short in Europe.
He's won 4 of the last 10 champions League.
Best of all time.
The worst argument I've ever heard is that "La lifa is easier to do it in, so Messi isn't the best ever"
Erm... this isn't some chump doing it in La Liga and falling short in Europe.
He's won 4 of the last 10 champions League.
Best of all time.
You mean 3. He was no where in 2006.
That's not how it works, Sicario. He started four games, came on in two more, got a goal and an assist. That he's won 4 of the last 10 CLs isn't an opinion, but a fact.
How much tangible difference did he actually make to that CL side in 2006? Does anyone remember what he did in that campaign? If Messi did not feature at all that year would Barcs still have won the CL? Let's not give total credit for something he didn't even play a major part in.
It's like saying Wilshere won us the FA cup in 2015.
First of all, Wilshere played one match. Second, he didn't say Messi won them the Champions League. He said that Messi has won the Champions League four times, which is still a fact. You both changed the wording and used someone who played six times fewer matches than Messi as an example. Poor attempt at exaggeration to rationalize what you're saying.
If we win the FA cup this year Ospina will have won it, that does not mean "he's won us the FA cup". Big difference.
Even Djimi Traore has won the CL.
Jus' sayin'
Sicario wrote:How much tangible difference did he actually make to that CL side in 2006? Does anyone remember what he did in that campaign? If Messi did not feature at all that year would Barcs still have won the CL? Let's not give total credit for something he didn't even play a major part in.
It's like saying Wilshere won us the FA cup in 2015.
Didn't he destroy Chelsea that year?
Clrnc wrote:Gurgen wrote:They still had Thuram, Blanc, Desailly, Deschamps and Vieira, all formidable players at the time. Zidane certainly didn't do it all alone.
Vieira hardly had any minutes in the tournament. Only started in 1 match and made just 1 further sub app.
Most of those players mentioned actually carried Zidane in that tournament. He only showed up in the final but was living up to his bottler tag before that (and was widely criticised).
About 20 years later, it's now being said he carried the French team - hilarious!
Players like Djorkaeff, Karembeu (had a top season with Madrid) are hardly mentioned despite playing better than Zidane in the tournament.
You are right about the contribution of the other players being forgotten.
You mention offensive players but i think the defensive capabilities of that team are what carried them to glory.
Even then i still think France only won it because Ronaldo suffered that panic attack or whatever it was that turned him into a shell.
Good example of the collective being better than the individual.
Maradona is the only player, i think, won his country the WC.
Also i know he played for the enemy but George Best was right up there.
I understand why the wide masses have such an interest in the WC but surely for people who have more than a casual fleeting interest in football they'd realise that it's hardly the indicator for quality? If Maradona was born a couple hundred kilometers to the North or West in Paraguay or Chile he'd have never got close to win the WC.
Zidane was one of my heroes back in the day but I reckon Ronaldo is the one I'd list straight after Messi on my all time list, such a shame that he hit his peak at 21 because of injuries.
Zidane is still one of my favourite players and i followed him closely since his time at Juve but no way was he better than real Ron in his prime.
There is, however, something about that lethargic elegance that makes the difficult seem so simple that makes me like him, Cruyff, Riquelme, Hagi, Ozil and even our very own Wilshere or Leicester's Mahrez. Same reason i liked Le Tissier and even "the magic man" as he was the contrast in that team.
They may not be the most effective players but i simply enjoyed/enjoy watching them.
Any excuse to quote Jorge Valdano on Riquelme:
"If we have to travel from point A to point B, everyone would take the six-lane highway and get there as quickly as possible. Everyone, except Riquelme. He would would choose the winding mountain road, that takes six hours, but that fills your eyes with scenes of beautiful landscapes."
Yeah I understand where you're coming from. The one player in that vein I'd list in front of everyone of that list would be Iniesta, he's the epitome of that "lethargic elegance" imo.
"Kinetic economy"
I saw Zidane take a high ball moving fast on the tip of his toe and kill it dead and for once I was stuck for words.
What about when you saw this
Le me in the Best player ever thread when a wild Danny Welbeck video appears.
Fuck that was a great moment though. Back when we could still hope.
Welbnaldo. Welbadona. Riquwelbme. Le Welbzier.
What the hell is Matthew fucking LeTissier doing in a conversation about the greats?!
Quincy Abeyie wrote:What about when you saw this
Bold Tone wrote:Any excuse to quote Jorge Valdano on Riquelme:
"If we have to travel from point A to point B, everyone would take the six-lane highway and get there as quickly as possible. Everyone, except Riquelme. He would would choose the winding mountain road, that takes six hours, but that fills your eyes with scenes of beautiful landscapes."
A beautiful quote - thanks!
Just came back to the thread and Quincy's post killed me.
Must have laughed for a minute.
e: Back to the thread, i think this is one of the most iconic world cup photos.
Watching the tournament i understand the fear on the faces of every one of those Belgians.
For those who don't know
It's an iconic photo indeed but, unfortunately, the picture lies.
Ronaldo scoring his 13th goal of the CL season, which tops all players. Too bad he is finished.
Those are two different situations.
I agree.
There was no need to spell out the goalkeeper's silly name.
Picture was gratuitous enough.
e: just teasing Rex ;D
Also to make Belgians feel a bit better, i will post a pic of the midget against us.
If you youtube the situation when that picture was taken, you will see that it is right after a freekick which goes straight into the wall. Even Maradona couldn't get teams to decide to put 6 guys on him.
i forget who i said before, but hopefully it was zidane
Rex wrote:What the hell is Matthew fucking LeTissier doing in a conversation about the greats?!
The conversation strayed onto guys who were mostly just lazy, cool and extremely gifted on the pitch as opposed to actually great.
Rex wrote:If you youtube the situation when that picture was taken, you will see that it is right after a freekick which goes straight into the wall. Even Maradona couldn't get teams to decide to put 6 guys on him.
hahaha - Yup. The picture is a lie. Made to create a sense of inhuman ability that requires 5 guys to mark him. Nothing more than a freekick.
If you youtube Messi vs 3 players, or Messi vs 4 players, you will find very long compilation of Wizardry.
Messi vs 4 players
Only a 14 minute compilation. lol
You are taking this conversation waaaaaay too seriously, my friend.
@Savicevic
That is so page 1.
We have reached page 15 (how to catch a chicken feat Tony Adams).
Savz wrote:Messi vs 4 players
Only a 14 minute compilation. lol
thats pretty ridiculous tbf
Bold Tone wrote:"Defenders try to follow him on Facebook, and he comes out on Twitter!" - Ray Hudson.ο»Ώ
Fooking superb video. All the footballers, pundits, managers, they all know. Messi is numero uno.
Just seen the documentary Impossible Champion about Argentina's 1986 World Cup win.
Good stuff.
Maradona-u-ackbar.
The 86 World Cup was the pinnacle for me.
Every single one since then has been a let down and i have almost reached total apathy.
International football was exciting in those days as there was no satellite tv/internet so you hardly knew the players from other countries.