• The Houseboat
  • Other clubs transfer thread 2015 (Latest: Man City sign De Bruyne)

Claudius wrote:

Giroud went through a 6 or 7 game spell where he couldn't find the goal if it landed on him. Would've been nice to have a Mandzukic who could come in 2 or 3 games into that drought to try something different.

That's something that happens every season where he goes 1-2 months without scoring.

The one transfer at another club I am (not) looking forward to seeing is the Falcao move. If he regains some of his form, it will be a master stroke for Mourinho. Even if he gets 12-15 goals, that would still be a good season for a team that already has Costa. Falcao was once upon a time the best striker in the world, better than Cavani, Ibra and the rest. Injury is a horrible thing

Claudius wrote:

The one transfer at another club I am (not) looking forward to seeing is the Falcao move. If he regains some of his form, it will be a master stroke for Mourinho. Even if he gets 12-15 goals, that would still be a good season for a team that already has Costa. Falcao was once upon a time the best striker in the world, better than Cavani, Ibra and the rest. Injury is a horrible thing

IMO he was coming back into form & he'd scored 2 in 3 for Monaco at the start of the season, and then 3 in 2 at international level this year prior to the Copa (or visa versa).  It was the ManU period as an anomaly & it remains to be seen if he has the mental fortitude to regain his touch in front of goal.

He has played like shit at the Copa America. No worries he is done, just one more big check for him and Mendes from Mou.

One thing I've noticed about Falcao is that he struggles to separate from defenders now. I wouldn't completely write him off as players like Toni have been able to resurrect their careers from the abyss. If he goes to Chelsea, he'll be more Shevchenko/Torres. I think he'd have more of a chance in Italy/Spain.

On another note, he looks really strange to me w/out long hair. I remember Crespo was better w/ long hair than short hair!

I think Falcao's been mis-managed by Van Gaal. It's going to be hard to recover from the confidence issues as well as adjusting to a higher paced league in addition to the ravages of his injury. If he'd moved to England when he moved to Monaco he'd be a success.

Former Tottenham midfielder Iago in Roma talks

Gunner89 wrote:
Loylz wrote:

You can go look up the minutes he's played. He's started 6 more games than him. Which, even if he was subbed off after the first half of every game is still considerable more minutes to score that 1 goal.

No one said anything about Neuer or Lahm. Don't put words in my mouth. You picking goal stats to prove his quality but those numbers, considering the dominance in the teams he's played for and the quality of the league, are not at all impressive.

You cite Lewadonski but if you want you can look at his stats, he's scored more than Mandzukic's highest tally in all but 1 (and that occasion was by one goal) of his last 4 seasons. Mario Gomez scored 39 and 41 goals at Bayern.

Mandzukic could not reach those tallies in his life. Giroud's level isn't what a top striker should be judges and if Mandzukic was getting Giroud numbers in the best team in the world. If you accept that Giroud is an jut a decent striker then that showing is pretty average.

As per your blue bit you obviously don't know what you are talking about-

I did look up the minutes-

Giroud-1856
Mandzukic-1932

So by "considerable more minutes" you mean less than 90? Because that's the difference in the minutes both played league football.

Even in his best purple patch he barely beat's Mario's league haul and scores less than Mario overall.

Not sure if you read my post properly but I mentioned Lahm and Neuer specifically for your arguments about a "poor" league.

Mandzukic could not reach those tallies in his life eh? But pep chose to play Mandzukic over Gomez? I wonder why?  And if Mandzukic couldn't reach those tallies neither could Giroud as Giroud scores less than Mandzukic.

Mandzukic also played in a league where you play a maximum of 34 games not 38 games too.

2012/13

Mandzukic
Goals:15
Minutes:1725
Goals/min:115

Giroud
Goals:11
Minutes:2332
Goals/min:212

2013/14

Mandzukic
Goals:18
Minutes:2015
Goals/min: 112

Giroud
Goals:16
Minutes: 3068
Goals/min: 191.75

2014/15

Mandzukic
Goals:12
Minutes: 1932
Goals/min: 161

Giroud: 14
Minutes: 1856
Goals/min: 132.5

Even with a new team and Giroud's best ever purple patch he barely beat's mandzukic leagur hsul once. Shite version of Giroud but who scores more at a faster rate. This is RAWK-esque levels of delusion.

As per your  blue bit you certainly haven't got a clue.

Question, has Mandzukic ever reach Gomez' tallies? Obviously not, so don't see how you could argue that? Has Giroud? No, but then again no one ever said that. But Mandzukic and Gomez' tallies are comparable because they both happened to be playing for the best team in the world (even more so in Mandzukic's case) in a poor league. Once again no one ever mentioned Giroud ever reaching those tallier because he most likely never will.

 

The only time they've been in comparable leagues and in comparable teams Giroud has outscored Mandzukic if we're going by your league only logic (which coincidentally has always been all competitions when it suits your purpose because otherwise it would show the difference in minutes to be over 700 mins but whatever). Regardless he's scored more goals in less minutes when their respective teams and leagues are at a comparative level. What Mandzukic has done previously is neither here nor there as one is playing for the all conquering Bayern and the other for an Arsenal side struggling for 4th. 

Is Giroud good enough to lead us to the title. No. Is anyone suggesting that? No. But neither is Mandzukic. Cite Bayern and how he won it there if you want but when the support cast is that good compared to your rivals you could put Bendtner in and still win the league. They are both pretty average strikers, just so happened that one has inflated numbers from a poorer league. And even then the numbers are not that much different. Your numbers show that the highest different in their league hauls is 4? Even extrapolate for the extra 4 games he missed out and the difference would be about 6 goals. If you think that's a significant amount considering their respective teams and leagues than fair enough. I don't however.

If we can't get Cavani/Benzema then I'd stick Walcott up front, have Giroud, Alexis and Welbeck as options, and go all out and sign a top class wide forward who has a known track record of scoring.

Cech, Reus and Schneiderlin in this window and I believe we put ourselves in a position where we have a good chance of winning the league.

Klaus wrote:

I'm not particularly interested in the goals argument, but it can also be used to illustrate a different point in this case: it doesn't really matter how much your striker scores if he screws up the game for the rest of the team. Gomez scored 41 goals for Bayern and cost them a Champions League trophy. He was an utter donkey. Bayern realised it and bought Mandzukic instead, who scored exactly half as much but was clearly a superior player, and then they went on to win everything they could in the following two seasons with him up

This is spot on, the over analysing of a players goal scoring record really doesn't tell you much at all. Particularly when the difference is only a few goals

Loylz wrote:
Gunner89 wrote:

As per your blue bit you obviously don't know what you are talking about-

I did look up the minutes-

Giroud-1856
Mandzukic-1932

So by "considerable more minutes" you mean less than 90? Because that's the difference in the minutes both played league football.

Even in his best purple patch he barely beat's Mario's league haul and scores less than Mario overall.

Not sure if you read my post properly but I mentioned Lahm and Neuer specifically for your arguments about a "poor" league.

Mandzukic could not reach those tallies in his life eh? But pep chose to play Mandzukic over Gomez? I wonder why?  And if Mandzukic couldn't reach those tallies neither could Giroud as Giroud scores less than Mandzukic.

Mandzukic also played in a league where you play a maximum of 34 games not 38 games too.

2012/13

Mandzukic
Goals:15
Minutes:1725
Goals/min:115

Giroud
Goals:11
Minutes:2332
Goals/min:212

2013/14

Mandzukic
Goals:18
Minutes:2015
Goals/min: 112

Giroud
Goals:16
Minutes: 3068
Goals/min: 191.75

2014/15

Mandzukic
Goals:12
Minutes: 1932
Goals/min: 161

Giroud: 14
Minutes: 1856
Goals/min: 132.5

Even with a new team and Giroud's best ever purple patch he barely beat's mandzukic leagur hsul once. Shite version of Giroud but who scores more at a faster rate. This is RAWK-esque levels of delusion.

As per your  blue bit you certainly haven't got a clue.

Question, has Mandzukic ever reach Gomez' tallies? Obviously not, so don't see how you could argue that? Has Giroud? No, but then again no one ever said that. But Mandzukic and Gomez' tallies are comparable because they both happened to be playing for the best team in the world (even more so in Mandzukic's case) in a poor league. Once again no one ever mentioned Giroud ever reaching those tallier because he most likely never will.

 

The only time they've been in comparable leagues and in comparable teams Giroud has outscored Mandzukic if we're going by your league only logic (which coincidentally has always been all competitions when it suits your purpose because otherwise it would show the difference in minutes to be over 700 mins but whatever). Regardless he's scored more goals in less minutes when their respective teams and leagues are at a comparative level. What Mandzukic has done previously is neither here nor there as one is playing for the all conquering Bayern and the other for an Arsenal side struggling for 4th. 

Is Giroud good enough to lead us to the title. No. Is anyone suggesting that? No. But neither is Mandzukic. Cite Bayern and how he won it there if you want but when the support cast is that good compared to your rivals you could put Bendtner in and still win the league. They are both pretty average strikers, just so happened that one has inflated numbers from a poorer league. And even then the numbers are not that much different. Your numbers show that the highest different in their league hauls is 4? Even extrapolate for the extra 4 games he missed out and the difference would be about 6 goals. If you think that's a significant amount considering their respective teams and leagues than fair enough. I don't however.

You're just trying to change goal-posts here. You clearly mentioned the "considerable" difference between minutes which have been proved wrong. The one major change of two from Gomez to Mandzukic lifted them from runners-up in the Cl, DFB Pokal and 2nd to treble winners so no matter how one tries to downplay his significance says it all. There is a reason when both of Gomez and Mandzukic played in the same team it was Mandzukic who was first choice.

I never said the blue bit here. I believe the claim was Madzukic is a "shite" version of Giroud. By that logic Giroud would be scoring at a considerably better rate than Mandzukic in the Bundesliga. If you think that he's going to average near-abouts a goal a game then fair enough but I think that's implausible.

Yes it's good that you mentioned Bendtner because he has the best assister in Europe this last season and is still doing crap. 

The notion that you can put Bendtner in that team and win the league is laughable.

Of course they could win Bundesliga with Bendtner up front. They outplayed City with 10 men at the Etihad like they were with a man more themselves. Bayern are heads and shoulders above everyone in Germany.

That said, I don't understand how Bundesliga or any other league apparently is much worse than PL. Those times are over, the PL has the most money, but it's being spent on absolute gobshite as usual, especially on overpriced English players.

Irish gunner wrote:
Ricky1985 wrote:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/chelsea/11688491/Chelsea-hold-talks-over-move-for-Alex-Song.html

Chelsea, City and West Ham all trying to sign Alex Song. Barcelona want a £5m fee but there's been talk of them cancelling his contract and letting him go on a free transfer in order to find someone that will take his 70k a week wages off their books.

5m is a very good price for Song.

Sad that the only reason Chelsea and City would be interested in Alex Song is because he qualifies as a home grown player.  Absolutely disgusting that both these teams have no home grown players of their own.

Kike Marin** ‏@Kike_Marin_  23m23 minutes ago
@Arsenal Wenger doesn't work with Jorge Mendes. Normal, portuguese agent is a pirate. Jackson Martínez (Porto) the latest example.

seems to be common knowledge wenger wont ever sign a mendes client. said this last year when there was a clamour for falcao. pretty sure mendes shafted wenger in the cristiano ronaldo deal by shopping him to united after a verbal agreement was in place with us, and its been frosty ever since. it alienates us from a huge chunk of the market, but im actually not that fussed. his clients price always seems to be inflated.

Chili Palmer wrote:

Of course they could win Bundesliga with Bendtner up front. They outplayed City with 10 men at the Etihad like they were with a man more themselves. Bayern are heads and shoulders above everyone in Germany.

That said, I don't understand how Bundesliga or any other league apparently is much worse than PL. Those times are over, the PL has the most money, but it's being spent on absolute gobshite as usual, especially on overpriced English players.

all of the top 4 teams in England this season would have finished in at least 2nd place in Bundesliga, and maybe even the top 5. and the story continues as you go down. it's a weak league relative to England. the only thing holding England back is an inability to compete with the vast legal and illegal riches of Real and Barca

It's not as simple as that is it-

They had Mario Gomez who scored 39 goals and then 41 goals and won the bundesliga on neither occasion.

Anyways back to getting this thread to what it's for-

“At 1.30 it was all done,” Galliani told La Gazzetta dello Sport. “Monaco had given us the all-clear for the sale at €40m with payment spread over two years, €20m and €20m.

“The agreement with Geoffrey had already been sorted out the night before and was confirmed that same morning by him and his father.

“After we exchanged the documentation, at 1.30pm everyone disappeared. Evidently they changed their minds or the others offered more.”

“If we save €40m on Kondogbia and €35m on Jackson Martinez, we’ll have another €75m to spend wisely over the rest of the transfer window,” added Galliani.

As to why suddenly Inter and Milan are able to spend more money. Some words from our own CEO Ivan Gazidis-

"[size=x-small][font='Lucida Grande', 'Trebuchet MS', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]What’s happening with FFP isn’t what’s being reported. There are some amendments. Basically, they’re for clubs that are not in the Champions League, if you’re outside the Champions League and you have a plan for how you want to develop, you are allowed to invest a bit more money, but you have to get yourself back into the confines within three years, so it’s not quite what’s being reported."[/font][/size]

Claudius wrote:
Chili Palmer wrote:

Of course they could win Bundesliga with Bendtner up front. They outplayed City with 10 men at the Etihad like they were with a man more themselves. Bayern are heads and shoulders above everyone in Germany.

That said, I don't understand how Bundesliga or any other league apparently is much worse than PL. Those times are over, the PL has the most money, but it's being spent on absolute gobshite as usual, especially on overpriced English players.

all of the top 4 teams in England this season would have finished in at least 2nd place in Bundesliga, and maybe even the top 5. and the story continues as you go down. it's a weak league relative to England. the only thing holding England back is an inability to compete with the vast legal and illegal riches of Real and Barca

How do you figure that out? Considering the seasons they've just had, I'd fancy any of Leverkusen, Gladbach, and Wolfsburg to beat ManU, quite easily tbh. Maybe over a course of a season squad depth would show, though.

Dortmund who finished 7th or so, smashed us to pieces in Germany. I don't think there's as huge difference between the leageus as people make it out.

The PL teams are tactically rubbish, and they're getting found out time and time again in Europe. If we want to make claims such as the best league in the world, it needs to be shown in Europe, and that isn't the case at the moment, far from.