qs! wrote:
Shady Shakes wrote:
If we're looking at strikers (which we should be), we ought to target someone in their early 20s who we can develop into a top 4/5 striker in world football. I'm thinking of the two Lyon boys, but I'm sure there are others out there.
In football things change all the time. There could be about 10 strikers out there who could all go on to be world class. Maybe 2 will reach it no matter what, but the other 8 will need circumstances and luck to fall their way. For this group it will come down to which gets signed by a top club that will give them chances to play.
This is what I want and its what Wenger used to be great at. Those days feel like a long, long time ago now though.
What OTF said.Â
People forget that we lucked out on Henry, only because he was so terribly misused at Juventus.
Anelka left as quickly as he arrived.
van Persie took 30 years to deliver the goods, and that's despite no-one but Wenger seeing any potential in him as a striker.
Signing top strikers is far easier said than done.
Many moan about not signing a better striker than Giroud or Welbeck for that matter. Yet, if you ask those guys who could we have bought, they'd all clutch at Cavani made straws, or Benzema ones.
Since we lost Robin Van Persie, there was nobody top class who we could have signed. The ones we tried for failed, Higuain and Suarez.Â
If we could have signed someone better than Giroud and Welbeck, why would we refuse to do it? There's no logical reason not to.