Klaus wrote:
otfgoon wrote:
He is good enough to start for them, or at least get game time for them.
I don't think he is. Gnabry is one of the weirdest Arsenal hypes in a long time. He did reasonably well for us when he was asked to fill in, but the bloke has no outstanding qualities. He's the typical player who gets game time at Arsenal because we can afford it, but at a club where they're fighting tooth and nail for every point he's not going to be on the pitch unless he contributes.
I'm puzzled over why we loaned Gnabry to a Premier League club to begin with. The club should have realised that it's above his current level.
Really, Gnabry has no outstanding qualities? Has to be one of the biggest rubbish I've read recently. His technique is outstanding, would easily be amongst the best in our team. Wouldn't be surprised if he has the best first touch in the team. Gnabry is up there as one of the most talented players to progress through the youth rank in the last 5 years or so. The likes of Crowley, who you rate, are nothing compared to Gnabry frankly.
Now his injury might have fucked his career up, I'm not sure, but in terms of raw talent he was amongst the best to make it through. If not for missing almost two seasons of football, I'd definitely favour him over Oxlade.
