Inspired by Yuv.
Suarez: the great moral dilemma of our time
I wish I could pick all 4 options at the bottom.
Ok. It probably should be multi choice anywayβI couldn't decide.
Wheres the "Wenger out now!" option?
There you go, guys! 8)
ebouefan wrote:No, because he's overrated and overpriced.
No, because his antics would disrupt us or he'd want to leave quite soon.
No, because he's an embarrassing dick-socket.
Fuck no. Just no. Reprehensible person and I can't believe you're even asking.
Wenger out now!
That listing is acceptable Tone.
Biggus wrote:Wheres the "Wenger out now!" option?
Added.
Thanks Burnsy you're a scholar and a gentleman, but it doesn't work......
Aw, you can't change your vote? Hang on, I'll add a tally in for you.
There you go. No one who doesn't read this closely will know it was you, but your OMITTocratic franchise has now been respected.
No I haven't voted yet, the Wenger out option doesn't work......I sense the foul hand of Rex in all of this.
i think you and Rex are on the same team this time.
Burnwinter wrote:Biggus wrote:Wheres the "Wenger out now!" option?
Added.
For balance and fairness, you may have to add more ball-hugging options for when the Suarez crew wake-up.
Bold Tone wrote:For balance and fairness, you may have to add more ball-hugging options for when the Suarez crew wake-up.
How come you can vote 4 times Tone?
Heh heh that reminds me of that Blackadder episode- "It simply reflects how firmly I believe in the proposition".
A moral dilemma indeed. Have to say I'm a bit surprised to see so many gooners be so strongly against signing him. He's a horrible character but we're desperate here being as trophyless as Suarez is classless and here's a player who might very well be able to help us change that. He'd fit in our system and style of play like a glove and can win us games on his own and if we can't find a better alternative then we're going to have to live with Giroud being the focal point of our attack and that thought makes my stomach turn.
Therefore I ended up voting "Yes, but only if a comparably brilliant player with a better character is not available."
In the end I don't think it'll matter much anyway. Great story for the papers linking us with Liverpool's talisman but also sparetime lunatic but I can't see them selling him to us (unfortunately).
Segway wrote:Therefore I ended up voting "Yes, but only if a comparably brilliant player with a better character is not available."
Hmm you need some sort of a graph whereby the X axis = the brilliance of a player and the Y axis = the cuntiness so that you can plot and compare players scientifically.
I do not want this to happen.
Hope he signs for Madrid
y va marquer wrote:Adjourned.
Get yourselves to the other Suarez thread
That vamp even looks a bit like Luis.
Biggus wrote:Segway wrote:Therefore I ended up voting "Yes, but only if a comparably brilliant player with a better character is not available."
Hmm you need some sort of a graph whereby the X axis = the brilliance of a player and the Y axis = the cuntiness so that you can plot and compare players scientifically.
That'd be great
I think you wouldn't find a better alternative if you did.
@ Iloveyouarsenewenger, that Suarez ad was funny, but it would have been better if a black guy had've walking in and Luis gave him the old 'I don't work with negrito's'.
Going to have to restrain myself from using vampire gifs every post in this thread
So many around
Biggus wrote:Hmm you need some sort of a graph whereby the X axis = the brilliance of a player and the Y axis = the cuntiness so that you can plot and compare players scientifically.
If you had such a graph then each player would be a scattergram point, and a fan's opinion "would take him / would not take him" would be a continuous curve through the 2D brilliance-vs-character plane, separating the two options.
You'd probably need to extend the third dimension up for the "at price point X" factor though.
Well isn't Kel a mathematician? we should get him to make one up.
@ Y va love the blood sucker gifs, you just have to get a Kroenke one!
I believe he is, yes. Which explains the relentlessly logical and rational character of his argumentation.
Biggus wrote:How come you can vote 4 times Tone?
Voted once but ticked all 4 boxes!
I can't even vote once...
Did you try to vote for Wenger out too Capi?
People think Suarez is overrated? And overpriced? He was close to being the best player in the PL last season.
Biggus wrote:Did you try to vote for Wenger out too Capi?
I tried to vote for all of them. :egg:
Biggus wrote:@ Iloveyouarsenewenger, that Suarez ad was funny, but it would have been better if Glen Johnson had've jumped out of a box and Luis gave him the old 'I don't work with negrito's'.
:angel:
Captain wrote:I tried to vote for all of them. :egg:
Only Tone is allowed to do that.
There is a way of tricking computers.
hint: loading!
Maybe it's a problem with my ad blocker or something.
Maybe my 4 votes activated a bug as i've also got ad block but it didn't affect me.
Can we have a "Why the fuck was the other thread closed" option?
Yeah why was that shut?
We also need a "I'm a racist and I support Suarez" option.
And an "Eboue" option, definitely an "Eboue" option
JazzG wrote:Can we have a "Why the fuck was the other thread closed" option?
Sorry. The maximum number of options allowed in a poll is 10.
Burnwinter wrote:JazzG wrote:Can we have a "Why the fuck was the other thread closed" option?
Sorry. The maximum number of options allowed in a poll is 10.
We need to lobby Pep to set this forum up on software which will allow more than 10 options!
Look just ask Tim if you have a problem with the servers and stuff.