I wish I could pick all 4 options at the bottom.

Ok. It probably should be multi choice anywayβ€”I couldn't decide.

Wheres the "Wenger out now!" option?

There you go, guys! 8)

ebouefan wrote:

No, because he's overrated and overpriced.
No, because his antics would disrupt us or he'd want to leave quite soon.
No, because he's an embarrassing dick-socket.
Fuck no. Just no. Reprehensible person and I can't believe you're even asking.
Wenger out now!

That listing is acceptable Tone. πŸ™‚

Biggus wrote:

Wheres the "Wenger out now!" option?

Added. πŸ˜‰

Thanks Burnsy you're a scholar and a gentleman, but it doesn't work......

Aw, you can't change your vote? Hang on, I'll add a tally in for you.

There you go. No one who doesn't read this closely will know it was you, but your OMITTocratic franchise has now been respected.

No I haven't voted yet, the Wenger out option doesn't work......I sense the foul hand of Rex in all of this.

πŸ˜† i think you and Rex are on the same team this time.

Burnwinter wrote:
Biggus wrote:

Wheres the "Wenger out now!" option?

Added. πŸ˜‰

For balance and fairness, you may have to add more ball-hugging options for when the Suarez crew wake-up.

Bold Tone wrote:

For balance and fairness, you may have to add more ball-hugging options for when the Suarez crew wake-up.

How come you can vote 4 times Tone?
Heh heh that reminds me of that Blackadder episode- "It simply reflects how firmly I believe in the proposition".

A moral dilemma indeed. Have to say I'm a bit surprised to see so many gooners be so strongly against signing him. He's a horrible character but we're desperate here being as trophyless as Suarez is classless and here's a player who might very well be able to help us change that. He'd fit in our system and style of play like a glove and can win us games on his own and if we can't find a better alternative then we're going to have to live with Giroud being the focal point of our attack and that thought makes my stomach turn.

Therefore I ended up voting "Yes, but only if a comparably brilliant player with a better character is not available."

In the end I don't think it'll matter much anyway. Great story for the papers linking us with Liverpool's talisman but also sparetime lunatic but I can't see them selling him to us (unfortunately).

Segway wrote:

Therefore I ended up voting "Yes, but only if a comparably brilliant player with a better character is not available."

Hmm you need some sort of a graph whereby the X axis = the brilliance of a player and the Y axis = the cuntiness so that you can plot and compare players scientifically.

I do not want this to happen.
Hope he signs for Madrid

y va marquer wrote:

Adjourned.
Get yourselves to the other Suarez thread

That vamp even looks a bit like Luis. πŸ™‚

Biggus wrote:
Segway wrote:

Therefore I ended up voting "Yes, but only if a comparably brilliant player with a better character is not available."

Hmm you need some sort of a graph whereby the X axis = the brilliance of a player and the Y axis = the cuntiness so that you can plot and compare players scientifically.

That'd be great πŸ˜ƒ

I think you wouldn't find a better alternative if you did.

@ Iloveyouarsenewenger, that Suarez ad was funny, but it would have been better if a black guy had've walking in and Luis gave him the old 'I don't work with negrito's'.