If it was the players decision to leave, due to lack of reserves opportunities/not a new deal, despite worse players like neita or reese get either a new deal or more reserve chances than him, then tbh I don't blame him, but if he did something and there was a valid reasons for Banfield, bould to let him leave, then fair enough. Not that cop out statement "Too many touches on the ball" when there are players in the reserves who do that but much much worse and possibly don't contribute as much to the attack as he does.
