All Hazard had to do was point out to the referee how much time was being taken, and the ref would have added it in injury time.

according to the daily fail, the ball boy Charlie Morgan is the son of one of the Swansea directors

😆

General Mirth wrote:

I genuinely feel sorry for Chelsea's Public Relations team. Every fucking season.

😆 They earn their money all right.

The "kid" looked older than Hazard.

General Mirth wrote:

I do not feel sorry for Chelsea's Public Relations team. Every fucking season.

😆 They earn their money all right.
[/quote]

Should have kicked that idiot ball boy harder if you ask me. And in his stupid twat face.

I think he clearly kicked the ball boy before the ball.

I actually like what the ball boy is doing. Very smart. Recently I remember one match where the manager was unhappy the ball boy returned the ball too fast and then they conceded shortly after. He is the son of the Swansea director and he is going to do whatever he can to make sure Swansea are through to the final.

Not like it will make any difference though. 13mins left with 2 goals to chase.

That's what I pay my Sky money for; to watch a retarded looking teenager lying on a football.

^ it's a dick move to hold on to the ball like that . But you're playing chelsea so I'd let that slide. The disappointment was crying like a bitch after the player retaliates. If you're going to be a dick and play with the big boys you've got to accept he'll try to wrestle the ball back.

If he was squally age then fair enough, but by 17 you can't be that embarrassing.

As I said Patters he looks older than Hazard.

I really don't know why people are complaining I think this is hilarious entertainment, our club wasn't involved so we can sit back and enjoy the theatre.

i don't see what hazard did wrong. that kid deserved a curb stomping. i hope some chelsea fans give it to him. idiots trying to make themselves a part of the story, no one is watching the game to see you fuckface.

Clearly kicks the ball

Fault:
I think 90% ball boy
5% Swansea
5% Hazard

Definitely not a red for me.

Doesn't matter you can't touch a member of the public/official no matter who's fault it was, the levels of violence might be different but the principle is the same as Cantonas kicking and punching a fan and Carragher throwing a coin into the crowd at Highbury, he'll be lucky just to get 3 matches.
Couldn't happen to a nicer club except maybe Man Utd.

He tried to get in the way of the game by laying on the ball. What that kid done was ridiculous and he deserved to be kicked, sadly that never happened. What he done was embarrassing for the game as a whole.

😆 The kid was a dick, Hazard was stupid.

That kid won't get another ball boy gig again, Hazard will be back in a couple weeks. But it's provided a lot of laughter for which I'm grateful.

sabret00the wrote:

Clearly kicks the ball

Fault:
I think 90% ball boy
5% Swansea
5% Hazard

Definitely not a red for me.

I disagree. Ballboy was blameless. He did the job he was paid to do!
99% of blame is with the rent boys heroes:
1% Hazard (the act)
11% Dennis Wise (why not)
21% Abramovich (his players)
31% Drogba (his patented diving and time-wasting technique)
35% John Terry (for being John Terry)

Bold Tone wrote:
sabret00the wrote:

Clearly kicks the ball

Fault:
I think 90% ball boy
5% Swansea
5% Hazard

Definitely not a red for me.

I disagree. Ballboy was blameless. He did the job he was paid to do!
99% of blame is with the rent boys heroes:
1% Hazard (the act)
11% Dennis Wise (why not)
21% Abramovich (his players)
31% Drogba (his patented diving and time-wasting technique)
35% John Terry (for being John Terry)

Who's the last percent? Don't leave me hanging!

1% Error (standard procedure on made up statistics)

Fulham football manager Martin Jol accused a Swansea City ball boy apparently 'kicked' by Chelsea's Eden Hazard of "playing rugby" by holding on to the ball too long.

The Dutchman said: "I felt for Hazard, but you can't kick people. He (the ball boy) was playing rugby with him, so I can understand he wanted to get the ball."

The Cottagers boss added that the ball boy, understood to be 17-year-old Charlie Morgan, was "probably overage".

Jol said: "Our ball boys are between 10 and 12 years of age. I saw he was probably over-age, probably 21. A big boy, you know?"

😆 It just goes to show that people will have an opinion on just about anything.