All Hazard had to do was point out to the referee how much time was being taken, and the ref would have added it in injury time.
Eden Hazard assaults child
according to the daily fail, the ball boy Charlie Morgan is the son of one of the Swansea directors
General Mirth wrote:I genuinely feel sorry for Chelsea's Public Relations team. Every fucking season.
They earn their money all right.
The "kid" looked older than Hazard.
y va marquer wrote:
General Mirth wrote:I do not feel sorry for Chelsea's Public Relations team. Every fucking season.
They earn their money all right.
[/quote]
Should have kicked that idiot ball boy harder if you ask me. And in his stupid twat face.
I think he clearly kicked the ball boy before the ball.
I actually like what the ball boy is doing. Very smart. Recently I remember one match where the manager was unhappy the ball boy returned the ball too fast and then they conceded shortly after. He is the son of the Swansea director and he is going to do whatever he can to make sure Swansea are through to the final.
Not like it will make any difference though. 13mins left with 2 goals to chase.
That's what I pay my Sky money for; to watch a retarded looking teenager lying on a football.
^ it's a dick move to hold on to the ball like that . But you're playing chelsea so I'd let that slide. The disappointment was crying like a bitch after the player retaliates. If you're going to be a dick and play with the big boys you've got to accept he'll try to wrestle the ball back.
If he was squally age then fair enough, but by 17 you can't be that embarrassing.
As I said Patters he looks older than Hazard.
I really don't know why people are complaining I think this is hilarious entertainment, our club wasn't involved so we can sit back and enjoy the theatre.
i don't see what hazard did wrong. that kid deserved a curb stomping. i hope some chelsea fans give it to him. idiots trying to make themselves a part of the story, no one is watching the game to see you fuckface.
Clearly kicks the ball
Fault:
I think 90% ball boy
5% Swansea
5% Hazard
Definitely not a red for me.
Doesn't matter you can't touch a member of the public/official no matter who's fault it was, the levels of violence might be different but the principle is the same as Cantonas kicking and punching a fan and Carragher throwing a coin into the crowd at Highbury, he'll be lucky just to get 3 matches.
Couldn't happen to a nicer club except maybe Man Utd.
He tried to get in the way of the game by laying on the ball. What that kid done was ridiculous and he deserved to be kicked, sadly that never happened. What he done was embarrassing for the game as a whole.
The kid was a dick, Hazard was stupid.
That kid won't get another ball boy gig again, Hazard will be back in a couple weeks. But it's provided a lot of laughter for which I'm grateful.
sabret00the wrote:Clearly kicks the ball
Fault:
I think 90% ball boy
5% Swansea
5% HazardDefinitely not a red for me.
I disagree. Ballboy was blameless. He did the job he was paid to do!
99% of blame is with the rent boys heroes:
1% Hazard (the act)
11% Dennis Wise (why not)
21% Abramovich (his players)
31% Drogba (his patented diving and time-wasting technique)
35% John Terry (for being John Terry)
Wenger 100%
Bold Tone wrote:sabret00the wrote:Clearly kicks the ball
Fault:
I think 90% ball boy
5% Swansea
5% HazardDefinitely not a red for me.
I disagree. Ballboy was blameless. He did the job he was paid to do!
99% of blame is with the rent boys heroes:
1% Hazard (the act)
11% Dennis Wise (why not)
21% Abramovich (his players)
31% Drogba (his patented diving and time-wasting technique)
35% John Terry (for being John Terry)
Who's the last percent? Don't leave me hanging!
1% Error (standard procedure on made up statistics)
Fulham football manager Martin Jol accused a Swansea City ball boy apparently 'kicked' by Chelsea's Eden Hazard of "playing rugby" by holding on to the ball too long.
The Dutchman said: "I felt for Hazard, but you can't kick people. He (the ball boy) was playing rugby with him, so I can understand he wanted to get the ball."
The Cottagers boss added that the ball boy, understood to be 17-year-old Charlie Morgan, was "probably overage".
Jol said: "Our ball boys are between 10 and 12 years of age. I saw he was probably over-age, probably 21. A big boy, you know?"
It just goes to show that people will have an opinion on just about anything.
Speaking this morning, Pat Nevin, a former Chelsea player said, like Hazard, he too would have kicked the ball boy.
And I'd have to agree. By smothering the ball, and then appearing to feign injury, the 17-year-old lt himself down, he let Swansea down, and he called into question the integrity of ball boys across the country. Nevin then suggested that ball boys should be banned. Nonsense. Retrieve the ball. Throw it back. Assume your position. Job done. Just do it the right way, the Arsenal way
y va marquer wrote:and he called into question the integrity of ball boys across the country.
Good Lord.
This Hazard assault is generating some golden comedy
Check out the subtle angle DM went for.
Ballboy has posted pictures of luxury holidays and expensive champagne
'Hazard's only crime is he hasn't kicked him hard enough' - Joey Barton
General Mirth wrote:
Check out the subtle angle DM went for.
The teenager retweeted someone else's £120,000 receipt with the caption, 'This is huge time'
"We also found a picture of Willy Wonka with a semi-rhetorical question and a condescending answer to said question printed all over it, a video link to a cat playing piano and a quote from a song that appears to be of Korean origin."
23rd Jan 2013 should be known as St Charlie's day for the next couple of weeks.
Great day for us (spanking Allardyce 5:1 with £32m worth of Hazard entertainment)
'Hazard's only crime is he hasn't kicked him hard enough' - Joey Barton
He always has to get involved doesn't he?
Absolutely hilarious. Couldn't happen to a nicer or more classy club.
Apparently Torres tried to kick the ball boy in the changing room but missed......
Can you imagine what would've happened it was Roy Keane instead of Hazard?
Doubt Keane would've touched him. He'd have gone to the father and kicked his head in though.
So the prevailing opinion among footballers seems to be that someone acting like a dick is an excuse to act like a dick yourself. Not surprising considering that most of them are complete fuckwits.
sabret00the wrote:Can you imagine what would've happened it was Roy Keane instead of Hazard?
Now you're getting into the spirit of it Sabre.
Tony Pulis wrote:Eden is not that sort of player- In fact you might say he's the victim in all this.
This kid seems like a Rich Kids of Instagram wannabe, evidently deserves a kicking as much as anyone, just not during the match.
I can't wait for the internet meme to start.
sabret00the wrote:Can you imagine what would've happened it was Roy Keane instead of Hazard?
"I'd waited long enough. I fucking hit him hard. The ball was there (I think). Take that you cunt"
JazzG wrote:The ball was there