Quincy Abeyie wrote:
Dunkirk was really good, incredibly intense. Probably Zimmer's best score in ages. As others have pointed out, this was a good fit for Nolan as he didn't have the opportunity to make the movie seem more clever than it is.
I thought it was good, though far from great.
Will agree that it was a very intense movie and it was refreshing that for a "war" movie it wasn't intense based on extreme violence/gore. There were some great scenes without an enemy in sight that had me riveted.
Where I was disappointed though was with the audio with a lot of inaudible dialogue and an overboard score from Hans Zimmer. I'm a huge fan of Hans Zimmer but the score was repetitive and lacked any distinct pieces/moments. Sounded like a watered down song from Inception.
Final though - I've always envisioned 70mm as being utilized for wider, panoramic shots. In Dunkirk <spoiler in white below>it seemed to forgo that to favor "submersive" shots that pulled you into dark, wet, and cramped environments. I'm struggling with whether that was good use of 70mm as the movie didn't focus on large battle scenes in which it could have shown a wider view, but it was also nice that the lack of battle scenes/enemy kept the movie about character(s).</spoiler>