Perhaps my dream of one day being a pacy 6'2" midget is only a decade or two away then.

Except for the pacy bit, I doubt I'll still be nimble in my 50s. Suppose I could go a pair of Pistorius legs.

17 days later

He is in demand. City are keen on him once they move Dzeko and supposedly missing out on RvP. Juve too for the same reason. Utd and us too see him as RvP deal backup. Plus I now hear Chelsea are in fray too due to fear of Hulk deal being too costly and difficult to conclude. Spurs as usual wish they had a chance.

For the record I think he is a class player. Think we just might see him at City next year. Poor Dzeko!!

We could just keep RVP, who is the superior player, and let everyone else worry about Llorente...

actually being able to convince rvp to stay beyond his contract would be quite some doing

Humble Rex wrote:

We could just keep RVP, who is the superior player, and let everyone else worry about Llorente...

That would be ideal. But anything over 20 mill and i'd be tempted to sell RvP. with Podolski/Giroud/Chamakh and Gerv i think we can do without a new striker and i'd rather reinforce our defense first. A quality CB and Sahin/M'villa would be great.

5 days later

How reliable are Marca on non-Real Madrid news?

It does not say we bid for him.
It says we're resigned to losing Van Persie and will use the money we get for selling him on Llorente
So far only Juve are reported to have bid.

he's a year to run on his contract - surely wenger's big economic brain will likey

Bumper Rex wrote:

We could just keep RVP, who is the superior player, and let everyone else worry about Llorente...

Maybe not quite Van Persie but Llorente is no dud ๐Ÿ™‚

Courtesy of Orbinho

10 of the 17 goals Llorente scored in La Liga last season were headers and he scored with 27 % of his shots.

I went off him a little after his showing in the Europe League and Copa del Rey finals but of the players realistically available to replace Van Persie I do think he's the best.

I don't think Llorente is all that to be honest, but will certainly score goals for us which I'll happily take.

Why are getting Llorente, I don't see the purpose of him when we got Olivier Giroud who his fairly similar to him. If we are going to get another central forward we should get Stevan Jovetiฤ‡ plus his hair is awesome.

He's too similar to Giroud I think. We could spend the money better.

We probably could do better than Llorente.
He's the more obvious of the choices I suppose.
His contract situation would probably mean that we'd be interested in terms of a bargaining position.
Jovetic would be the dream but I don't think Fioretina are going to part with him just yet and they'd probably be holding out for more money.

not sure jovetic would be the dream, but he is good - a lil too inconsistent at the moment in time, but if you're judging him purely on youtube clips then wahaaay! double thumbs up.

Tim wasnt it you saying we need another pure striker otherwise we're lumbered with chamakh if we get injuries/suspensions?

Llorente is pure goal threat.

Doumbia would be another good option - that man has dula type pace

Really not sure why everyone is so excited about this guy. I've only seen him a few times in full games, but he never stood out or was ever really involved in play. Seems like mostly a cherry picker to me.