Gunner89 Not worth 117m but worth the 90-100m that would have got him in may which is ok value in TODAY'S MARKET
If we'd popped up and signed Rogers for that (and by the way, why on earth would any club have done so?) in May, six weeks before City announced they were spraying cash on Anderson, people would've said it was an abominable deal. He's been well overvalued by Chelsea. Fees are high but that sum should be getting you a forward who's an elite technician with Rice's intelligence, not a player who's merely hard-working, durable, acceptably competent, and lucky in front of goal.
The negative nancies were all enjoying the day when Rogers scored early but Chelsea lost the match. Our new signing Tzolis, who cost the difference between Rogers' value and the fee Chelsea paid for Rogers, was just as influential as the one that supposedly got away, with a better personality to go with it.
I'm not gonna bet Tzolis has a better season but no one's gonna be mooning over Rogers next May.