Qwiss he had when he left man city 19 appearances and 0 goals in the pl at the age of 21, was getting very little chances, would have got very few chances...which is why he wanted to leave....3 years ago a 42m fee is a 70m fee today, it's a heck of a lot of money when you consider that for a player who's not proven
Of course it has turned out well for Chelsea but that's a gamble they took and of course City's academy is the best in england so invariably some successes will come out that will leave
But just for context as I said for a 21 year old player with 19 top flight league appearances - would you pay 70m today and would that not be a gamble?
For context that summer - City sold jesus for 45m when he was 25 with about a 100 goals for them and even Raheem Sterling who was 27 then went for 47m
Personally Palmer had one great season but then been injury prone and inconsistent