Burnwinter The weakness is that we struggle for the highest peak of unstoppability against defences comparable to our own for talent and organisation.
I agree with much of your post, but not really this bit as our most recent EPL results show we are also struggling to score against teams with relatively poor defences. I don't think anyone could say that Everton or Fulham's defence are comparable to our own in terms of talent or organisation.
Daz not really this bit as our most recent EPL results show we are also struggling to score against teams with relatively poor defences
It's true, but thinking about the Project™ not just the past few weeks, the heated claims about our attack being neglected under Arteta don't stand up to the fact we've scored 88 and 91 goals in our past two seasons.
We haven't neglected attack. We've given up beaucoup cash we might've used to recruit star forwards to push an offence based on ball-playing defenders and two ball-playing keepers—enjoying considerable success with that approach.
You can't look at this squad and say we shouldn't have signed Timber, Rice, White, Kiwior, Calafiori, Raya, etc. Take most of these players out and we'd have suffered for months at some stage, they've all been successes.
The forward signings meanwhile are suspect. Jesus is shit, Trossard is not a 90 minute athlete, Martinelli has lost his touch, and Havertz is stylistically frustrating and offering us patchy form.
It's more the case that if we had one more can-opener level, Saka level forward who could come in from the left of our attack, that player would be a huge multiplier for both left and right. The challenge is not to add to our tally of big names who aren't delivering.
Burnwinter the thing about the goals though are they aren't evenly distributed we've racked up some massive wins against really poor sides yet still failed to score in many games. I think we had ?5 last season and we are on 3 so far this season.
Last season that number got picked up because the number of games we failed to score was very high and not normally what a title winning side do. It shows the be we don't have reliable distribution of goals.. When we are flowing and playing well at can dispatch teams but we had a number of games where we weren't quite on it and it's those games we couldn't affect. We have a real problem scoring or being an effective attacking side when things aren't perfect and this is something that's being recurring with Arteta.
So I don't think the scoring most goals etc totally tells the story of what's going on or where we are at because inevitably you will have quite a few matches where your not functioning like you hope but if you blank in them that's enough to derail a title charge.
Mirth that's what I'm saying about Odegaard. So lame.
awooga83 Yeah but you're really just rehearsing the same points I've made but in a different tone of voice.
To be perfectly clear, it is preposterous and embarrassing when people suggest that a two point difference last season between a City team regarded as the best of this era and this Arsenal is a sign of us having a terrible squad that's terribly managed.
We're talking about missing one or two elite forwards and feeling the consequences. We're not discussing the abject failure of a years long project to reinvent the club, nor a criminal neglect of the need to win matches and score goals.
People should be proportionate because otherwise they sound hysterical.
Burnwinter for what it's worth, I think you can both be right here. I don't think either post negates the other.
Probably more precise articulations of it but in essence, my summation would be: "We are a good team (as primarily evidenced by the last two seasons) but there are also some gaps that need to be addressed to make us even better (as primarily evidenced by this season)."
Burnwinter I wasn't trying to suggest we haven't been a good team. But my thought is last season I think we were running hot pretty much at our peak and our average level might be a bit below that when, as more often happens, things don't quite go as we want. In which case even near our peak we aren't quite good enough to win the title. That also included a home defeat to villa where we failed to score and that trait of blanking when we aren't quite flowing is a big issue for this team. Last season it's impact is less visible because we for the most part maintained a very high level in the second half of the season with results. But if we don't have that it might be a bit more obvious.
Ultimately Arteta has pulled us back into that top 4 grouping and run us close. But the next step is to win the trophies and I think it's fair to question is he the manager that can take us on that next step. If it is to be him he needs to be willing to compromise some of his football style in my view and the question is can he do that, I'm not yet sure.
awooga83 I think it's fair to question is he the manager that can take us on that next step. If it is to be him he needs to be willing to compromise some of his football style in my view and the question is can he do that, I'm not yet sure.
Absolutely fair to question. But I think it’s important to zoom out a little when asking those questions.
We were having the same discussions last season and after Jan we had no problems scoring and it wasn’t because of set pieces. By May there were no questions.
The other side to recognise is that we are probably the most tactically astute and defensively tight team around. It’s not as glamorous as scoring and didn’t help us beat Everton, and it probably means we may need better quality forwards than another manager might, but either way I think it’s worth taking it all in and looking at our weaknesses and failures with some perspective.
From my point of view, a little tweak could make us the best team in Europe.
Burnwinter Squires is great - love his stuff.
Asterix Been a tiny bit hit and miss lately (I've come to expect brilliance) but that one was great.
Don Pacifico I don't think either post negates the other.
Yeah, I mean I think we all agree because the facts are relatively clear? We have clearly been doing very well in general, but we are clearly not in pole position to win the league this season, and we are clearly short of at least one elite forward.
awooga83 But my thought is last season I think we were running hot pretty much at our peak and our average level might be a bit below that
Contra that, the form we're in now is a carbon copy of the form we were in leading up to Christmas last season (remember the "finishing crisis"?). Our results are slightly worse, but we got lucky many times last season and that hasn't happened lately.
If I had to make a wager I'd say a superb back half of 23–24 might have reduced the urgency around signing forwards last summer.
goon We were having the same discussions last season and after Jan we had no problems scoring and it wasn’t because of set pieces. By May there were no questions.
To be fair, I think there were quite a few people who really wanted us to sign a top forward over summer, which didn't happen. I was personally more keen on getting in a brilliant younger deep-lying playmaker or pivot, a Henry-esque left winger was my second preference.
goon From my point of view, a little tweak could make us the best team in Europe.
If we bring in a left winger even eight tenths as good as Saka it'll be game over for these motherfuckers. We talked about this a lot last summer but all of Saka, Øde and Havertz would have a field day with the extra 1–2 yards of space a true left-sided threat would produce for them.
Burnwinter If I had to make a wager I'd say a superb back half of 23–24 might have reduced the urgency around signing forwards last summer.
Fully agree with this, we had an exceptional back end to the season which is not normal and allowed us to fall into the trap of maybe we don't need to address the attacking side of our game as urgently because look at the goals we got.
Can’t take my eyes off this goal
Claudius didn't realize in real-time how much of a blatant penalty that was. 
QuincyAbeyie glad he stayed on his feet because without VAR who knows what transpires
