Ødegaard is brilliant.
Timbers so much better on the right
We tear them up when we go forward.. We need to make all these chances count.
we should be 2-3 up. our right hand side is cooking up gourmet meals again
we've made good chances, should be another goal or two up
Ref is saying that's a freekick for a pull on the shirt but no yellow. Fuck right off.
Chaps anyone have a stream they can share please?
lorddulaarsenal
https://jokersportshd.org/5c1c8e52/4a43b6e7/3467333f
MistaT thank you!
Nice goal from Iwobi for your half time distraction
https://streamin.me/v/ab21dd51
MistaT that was a great goal.
Coombs Odegaard.
So many chances to shoot though and we kept overplaying
Clrnc we didn't even make a vague attempt to play this way without him. We just lumped it up to Kai or spammed crosses. I don't think any of this makes sense.
Coombs think having Jorginho and Odegaard really speeds up our play. Jesus is having a pretty good game as well linking up and passing and moving.
Coombs -- I do agree with your greater point that we (Arteta) was cowardly with Odegaard out. He tried a few times to make Trossard the creative focal point, but he slows the game down where as Odegaard accelerates it (despite taking quite a few touches).
Big Willie I just find it hard to accept that Odegaard is this much of a unicorn when I see other teams playing pass and move without him just fine.
Partey on for Jorginho at halftime. Good sub, we dont need Jorginho getting a red.
I thought Jorginho had a great half.
Jota throws the ball after committing a foul and no card?
USArsenal common sense
How the fuck was that not a yellow on Jota for pulling and throwing Trossard to the ground? Fuck off.
Coombs perhaps, but we have plenty of years of evidence to suggest the tetball Rube Goldberg machine doesn't function without 1 genius creator making it all tick
boom. what a hit by partey
Coombs
It's also the fact that Havertz isn't starting. We bought him to give us an aerial threat, so without him, we can't possibly play the same way with Jesus up front.
Maybe, but not letter of the law
