'can play multiple attacking positions and but has mainly played LW'

prefer a counter-attacking racehorse on the left wing, but I'll take a bernardo regen

had a quick squizz at moleira. not blown away. don't think I'd want his profile as a LW for us. he looks like a decent odegaard understudy, and that's about it.

Clrnc The main thing with him right now is just him being lazy? I don't watch that many United games

Ambitious signings if you get it wrong can be even more deadly than no signings. People love citing the Cech window as a terrible window which led to 2nd but then gloss over the 100m window which sent us spiralling out the CL and cost Wenger his job. Spending money does come with its own risks.

Also, medium level signings aren’t going to cut it. People don’t want anyone that’s performing better than Jesus. If that were true, people would be happy with Trossard, Havertz and Martinelli, but they aren’t. People want another Saka, but for the left side.

Why would we take a gamble on Rashford who is not even good enough for United? Seems crazy to me.

Wouldn't mind a loan for him given primary targets are likely to be difficult to get in January. Permanently, noooo.

est exactly - and frankly Rashford hasn’t even had half the career Sterling has had

If you said £20m fee and £150,000 a week, I’d take Rashford. He has a nice profile for the left forward. He checked out of United over 2 years ago

flobaba Stillman is such an equivocating apologist. Ultimate fence-sitter.

The thought experiment makes no sense from Elliot, either, but I'd obviously choose the attacker because that's something we can actually do. Not getting red cards is neither here nor there.

Look, the whole "signing players is hard" argument does absolutely nothing for me. I also could care less what other clubs do. People in more important lines of work do harder things everyday and get zero credit for it, because they're just doing their jobs. These overpaid goofballs don't get a pass.