Coombs Identifying is a very strange concept that isn't well conceived. My trouble is that is suggests preference, a sort of flippant notion of choice grounded in impulsive desire or convenience that is akin to deciding whether or not you want pickles on your cheeseburger.
Trans, in my understanding, is not a fetish or a sexual preference, although a trans person retains both as does anyone else. Rather, it is a response to dysphoria
Thanks for this intervention. I agree with what you wrote to a great extent.
Maybe it's interesting for all people in this discussion to consider claims such as "trans women are women" or "trans women are not women" in a different way.
Supporting or denying these apparently simple claims almost always involves unfolding a changing concept of the terms, whether it's "trans" or "woman" etc.
For instance anti-trans people might say "a woman has a uterus" and then backpedal to "a woman had a uterus" to account for women who've had hysterectomies they want to include, then maybe backpedal further when they hear about Müllerian agenesis (which affects around 1 in 5,000 XX-chromosomal bodies).
While I think these claims have their place—we use strong and simple rhetoric to win our causes in this world—they are just ways of getting things done, not eternal truths. They don't need to be eternal truths either.
In practical terms and in my experience, the things trans people ask for to live trans lives have always seemed easy for the rest of us. I don't see anything to kick off about. I don't care about pronouns, they are not a real burden on anyone. I don't care about bathroom intruders, that's made up. I don't care about "mummy-daddy-me" family values bullshit either … because don't you all know someone who had a horrible time with their happily married hetero mother and father?
Many of the practical problems for trans people are to do with accessing gender affirmative therapy and treatment. And I don't see why trans people should have to leap over a very high bar anywhere to access hormone therapy. It can be (and it is) a procedure of "informed and supervised consent" like many others we have in our health systems, with all the usual parent or guardian stuff for kids.
If you look around the world, there doesn't seem to be a high bar for people in general to access cosmetic surgeries, hormone therapies, magic weight loss pills and so on, all of which have become very common.
I would be the opposite of shocked if OMITT, a space which has a bunch of dudes pushing 40 or over, turned out to have some members on Ozempic or accessing ED medication—and good luck to them.
The fast-growing use by populations at large of these sorts of medicines and surgeries gives the lie to cis anti-trans anguish about the "scientific-biological" basis of trans expression of gender. The cited concerns are not much more than partisan dribble. They are selectively applied and they are mostly vacuous.
I don't say there is nothing worth discussing among these concerns. I do say they are nine tenths crap.
From what I have seen anti-trans people don't want the unfamiliar expression of trans life because it is scary for them. They seem to be phobic, which I deduce from their half-hollow, half-deranged discourse about "intruders" and "mutilation", and all their harping on rare cases so far outside trans norms that if we mapped the requisite standards of lunacy back to the mainstream, we'd be discussing serial killers and school shooters.
It seems to me like it's fine by many anti-trans onlookers if they take a weight loss pill or Viagra or shoot up steroids and say they're a stud, but it's suddenly Ragnarok if someone who used to present as male takes oestrogen and says she's a woman.
Isn't this a bit pathetic? I find it dumb. Why would you try to stop people doing stuff when it isn't a big deal for you and doesn't have any clear negative impacts you can be consistent about, and when you can't do it without making a rule for some but not for all?
If I do that kind of thing to other people, I would like to slow down with it.
Remembering to say "she / they" is about the least annoying facet of contemporary life, for you, me or Jordan Peterson. It is less annoying than the existence of Howard Webb. Some people just love to complain because it draws their attention away from other misery they experience.
So all this hateful crap bores me. I wouldn't want anyone placing these constraints on me for no reason other than a kind of stubborn malaise.
Secondly, it's a species of hypocrisy that wrecks the neighbourhood right up until it vanishes, like homophobia in the past. In a few years anti-trans folks will sound like the wine-nosed walri who called people "poofters" in the 1980s.
Finally if you like to talk a lot of anti-trans nonsense, you are sounding off about a few nice people I have known for a long time (and also the kids of a couple of nice people I know), so … cool your jets.