One interesting thing, I thought anyway - when I saw the line up, I didn't love it but I said to my mate Steve, we had the bench for a strong finish to the game. IF we could stay in it, which we did. Hopefully, Tet takes a lesson here that sometimes you have to "suffer" for a period - half hour, an hour, whatever it is - before you can impose yourself.
EDIT: I didn't explain this point in quite the way I wanted to (it's early) but what I wanted to say really was that finishing a game can be more important than how you start it. I'm not deluding myself that we battered City or anything like that, but to suffocate them in the way we did in the second half gave us the platform to go and win the game. Too many times, this fixture has been done after ten minutes, or we've started like a house on fire before fizzling out. I much prefer this way, even if it's not as aesthetically pleasing.
