Gazza M wrote:
Coombs wrote:
It's belief in themselves and each other that matters, not tactics or the system. That's what's abstract. It's a contributing factor but it is not the main factor in any sport.
those two things are linked together. belief in the guy next to you to execute the game plan isn't abstract, nor is it a minor factor.
Of course it's abstract. All belief is. Belief in systems even more so. If the prep is good, it's what you do when you're out of prep that makes the difference at the top level. If the prep is bad, then sure, you're basically done before you begin. Either way, I personally don't think sporting competition is primarily about abstract intellectual thinking, i.e. systems and tactics. Commitment, confidence, focus, morale, understanding, intensity, fitness, physicality, skill - these are all more important than systems or tactics in the end. Trends that privilege the latter are reductionist, designed to take something inherently ineffable (so-called "soft factors") and quantify it for ease of consumption. On the ground, in the moment, it's all just numerical noise, graphs, and charts. Much more suited to reflection, than action. It's important, it provides a richer information set from which to act on next, and it's probably more important than I'm making out, but it definitely isn't as crucial as our data-obsessed culture seems to think.
Anyway, your point is well taken. I just get irked by all the systems talk.