My overall take on Assange's extradition … firstly, since WikiLeaks first emerged to prominence, most of the decisions Assange has made as an organiser have been destructive to his organisation's ostensible mission.
By making himself a public figure Assange risked his existing and potential sources more, and became a single point of failure and a venue for conflicts of interest. After the Sweden rape accusations, Assange chose to fight them via WikiLeaks (and an as yet unsubstantiated CIA honey trap theory) rather than as a private individual.
Assange has a long history of apparent misconduct towards women, and has made strange statements indicating an obsession with "impregnating virgins" … he has children with four different women. Years ago there was a Gawker piece detailing a truly icky correspondence he had with a woman he'd encountered who ended up not wanting to date him.
The psychological impact of living under effective house arrest for the past seven years has probably been undervalued. That's a very considerable punishment in and of itself.
His extradition to the US, and the legal precedents that are being set in relation to that, have to be loudly opposed. I also believe that Assange as an individual doesn't "deserve" more hardship, but that the accusations made against him in Sweden shouldn't be delegitimised. I think that most of his activity since Collateral Murder was released has limited the effectiveness of WikiLeaks. I also question the theory that transparent availability of information produces political change.