General Mirth wrote:
I don't even get the issue, even if Cech turns out be a bad signing - we'll go back to exactly what we have now which most of us are ok with. There's nothing to lose - even his wages will be covered by the sale of a player who isn't any where near our squad.
There's something to lose. We could be targeting someone better, although that's only some of our POV.
Honestly, nobody is complaining. Most are just skeptical, while hope to be proven wrong. It can swing both ways because there's simply too little evidence to argue for or against after being a reserve goalie for a year.
