qs! wrote:
Klaus wrote:
Because we had already sold these players ages ago. It's just money that comes back into the club now, same as new sponsorship deals or property development sales. It's not part of any transfer budget.
I agree with this. I think its disingenuous to include those figures in this thread.
We sold Vela really cheap because we had a buy-out option. Now we got rid of that buy-out option and got the rest of the fee we would have gotten. This fee was not included when we sold him, and not now (according to you and Klaus), so it's just supposed to not be included in any year's net spending?