est wrote: Klaus wrote: That shouldn't matter. That shot was blocked. It's a new situation when it comes off the defender. The offside is taken from the moment the ball is being played(shot or passed). Any deflection or rebound doesn't change the decision.
Klaus wrote: That shouldn't matter. That shot was blocked. It's a new situation when it comes off the defender.
That shouldn't matter. That shot was blocked. It's a new situation when it comes off the defender.
The offside is taken from the moment the ball is being played(shot or passed). Any deflection or rebound doesn't change the decision.
The 'deflection' is the moment the ball is being played here. I'm fairly certain of this.
I'll try to look it up after the game.
Klaus wrote: est wrote: He's offside when Giroud hits it, Klaus. Clear from the wide angle. That shouldn't matter. That shot was blocked. It's a new situation when it comes off the defender.
est wrote: He's offside when Giroud hits it, Klaus. Clear from the wide angle.
He's offside when Giroud hits it, Klaus. Clear from the wide angle.
I'm 95% certain that it's only a different situation in the case of a deliberate backpass from a defender.
Klaus, that's wrong.
If your rulebook is valid, every single rebound would be onside because we only count from the time the keeper saved it.
Offside is definitely taken from the moment the ball is played.
Ramsey! 😃 :dulaoohtobe:
Klaus wrote: Segway wrote: Yep and as much as I like Arteta he has to take a big part of the blame for that. Some of it, sure. We constantly play in a fashion where our players' weaknesses are exposed when the opponents put some pressure on us, though. That signals a broader flaw in our setup to me. It's not like we've looked better with other players in that position.
Segway wrote: Yep and as much as I like Arteta he has to take a big part of the blame for that.
Yep and as much as I like Arteta he has to take a big part of the blame for that.
Some of it, sure. We constantly play in a fashion where our players' weaknesses are exposed when the opponents put some pressure on us, though. That signals a broader flaw in our setup to me. It's not like we've looked better with other players in that position.
Totally agreed. It's the system rather than the individual players that's mainly to blame.
Cazorla is so shit at those situations...
Ohh Santi. His volleying is really poor considering his otherwise stellar shooting technique. He's skied a number of those sort of chances.
Crikey Cazorla's taken some wild shots in front of goal tonight. Other than that he's been a right pest for that Newcastle defence to deal with.
Segway wrote: Ohh Santi. His volleying is really poor considering his otherwise stellar shooting technique. He's skied a number of those sort of chances.
He can never keep those chances down. Always leaning back and skying it over.
He missed many many tap ins in just this 2 seasons already.
Clrnc wrote: Klaus, that's wrong. If your rulebook is valid, every single rebound would be onside because we only count from the time the keeper saved it.
The wording in the rulebook says "gaining an advantage from being in an offside position", which is why you can't score from a rebound if you've previously been offside. But that's not the case here. There are two players between Özil and the goal when the rebound comes.
Fair to say that Newcastle will only be interested in this game if we gift them a goal.
This the perfect game for someone like Wilshere.
Remy does worse 1 on 1 than Giroud.
Good save Szcz.
People think off Remy as a pace merchant but that was an excellent touch to set up Gouffran
qs! wrote: Remy does worse 1 on 1 than Giroud.
You mean Gouffran
Ramsey with some WC stuff.
Great counter.
Ramsey is a different class. We need two of him. Everybody else on our team looks JV next to this boy
