y va marquer wrote: Ah, the Star. If bookies have really slashed the odds there may be something in the rumour, no? Bookies had the Suarez bid information ahead of anyone else.
Ah, the Star. If bookies have really slashed the odds there may be something in the rumour, no? Bookies had the Suarez bid information ahead of anyone else.
Wouldn't read anything into what the bookies do unless its like 1/10 or they stop taking bets.
Ancelotti reiterating that Morata is going nowhere. http://www.insidefutbol.com/2014/01/09/alvaro-morata-is-going-nowhere-carlo-ancelotti-quashes-talk-of-real-madrid-exit-for-arsenal-target/120654/?
Giovinco would be interesting. Would probably be too similar to Cazorla in our setup, but an excellent player when used correctly. Our passing football would suit him much better than Juve's defensive system.
Giovinco would be a pointless signing. Nothing in that rumour i'd guess.
I don't think so either, but he certainly wouldn't be a pointless addition to the squad. Just not very useful for the starting eleven at the moment.
would be a waste. if you want help in AM, why not get the fat guy from Bayern Munich?
Giovinco, the midget, no thanks.
It ain't cool to call people midgets anymore
Giovinco as false 9 will work.
That sounds like a truly horrible idea tbh.
Forget giovinco, if we are going to go small, we should get Pedro from Barcelona. I think he could the number nine role well.
What's with the craze of people wanting to use players who aren't remotely close to being a proper centre forwards in the centre forward position? Draxler/Reus/Pedro/Walcott etc. Jesus.
Jesus could definitely play at 9.
Poor on crosses.
😆
True, but he always comes back.
Rex wrote: Jesus could definitely play at 9.
Volante wrote: Poor on crosses.
http://vozpopuli.com/deportes/37025-diego-costa-dice-no-al-arsenal
