Still over a month to go til we kick off!
Well yawnfest
Luis la biter Suarez
Don't fuss and fight guys.
"Arsenal pursuing Higuain & Suarez in hope of signing no one. No fee agreed on Higuain, probably need to pay £40m release clause for Suarez"
Because, we will need to simultaneously sign both of them using the whole £75m war chest, as we only have Giroud and Gervinho to fill in when Suarez goes for his hattrick 15 game ban and Rooney decides to go on strike when he, inevitably, decides to want wage parity with Man City's strikers after Coleen gets jealous.
Fantastic.Mr.Fox wrote:One best strikers in the world atm out there but, he's a diver and a racist. Dont want. The shit he does could derail our season at any point.
dont think hes a racist. he is just stupid
Bold Tone wrote:Don't fuss and fight guys.
But thats what we do.....How long have you been here now?
Dont want that racist, buck-toothed, greasy, diving cannibal anywhere near the club.
Biggus wrote:Bold Tone wrote:Don't fuss and fight guys.
But thats what we do.....How long have you been here now?
Shh. I'm learning. That was the dummy i threw to cover up the sarc-fest remainder of the post.
If he has a 40 million release clause, then, we'll offer 38 million and miss out over the other two million.
I'm in shock.
I can't stand Suarez and indications are we're going to go mental and smash or transfer ceiling for him.
I really don't believe this for a second, and nor do I want to.
I don't believe we have a shot, here. What irks me is this 40 million clause thing that is not clearly defined here.
I don't want to believe it either but it looks like somebody wants this rumour to be taken seriously.
It's the least likely of all the rumours we've seen this summer. There's no chance we're in for Suarez as long as Wenger is in charge.
Hmmm. It's the least likely but how come it's the rumour that the more reputable newspapers are going with?
Klaus wrote:It's the least likely of all the rumours we've seen this summer. There's no chance we're in for Suarez as long as Wenger is in charge.
Do you feel so because you don't think Wenger is decisive enough to part with the large sums of money that would be required to force Liverpool to sell him to us or because you don't feel Wenger will want a cunt like him in our team?
My agreement to your assessment of it being the least likely of all serious rumours is based on the former reason.
y va marquer wrote:Hmmm. It's the least likely but how come it's the rumour that the more reputable newspapers are going with?
They were going with Higuain two weeks ago.
No such thing as a 'reputable paper'.
Iloveyouarsenewenger wrote:Klaus wrote:It's the least likely of all the rumours we've seen this summer. There's no chance we're in for Suarez as long as Wenger is in charge.
Do you feel so because you don't think Wenger is decisive enough to part with the large sums of money that would be required to force Liverpool to sell him to us or because you don't feel Wenger will want a cunt like him in our team?
My agreement to your assessment of it being the least likely of all serious rumours is based on the former reason.
Bit of both. Most of all I think Wenger would go for someone else if we were willing to throw that much money on a single transfer. I'd certainly expect to get a better player than Suarez in exchange for £40 million.
y va marquer wrote:Hmmm. It's the least likely but how come it's the rumour that the more reputable newspapers are going with?
All those reputable newspapers had Higuian catching the flight to London more than a week ago. I don't think the editors take football journalism seriously and look at it merely as a means to get hits on the website. So, they go with any story that comes from any source remotely reputable - which makes it very easy for vested interests to plant false news.
May be Suarez's agents are trying to bring attention to him so as to hasten up any bids from Real Madrid or Chelsea. But, given that the figure of 30 million is being quoted, I won't be surprised if it is us.
Wenger did appear to think that Suarez was punished too severly by the FA for biting Ivanovic
Doesn't really sound to me that he has an issue with Suarez on moral grounds.
"I believe what has gone completely against Suarez is his history," the Gunners manager said.
"That is very heavy on the offence front and that is why he has been punished so severely. That's the only explanation I can find.
"The written reasons for the panel's sanction are expected to be made public at some stage today.
Wenger believes there needs to be clarity on how the panel arrived at the punishment it did.
"I believe what (the FA) has to explain is whether the punishment is based on the severity of the tackle or offence, or whether it is based on the history of the player, and whether it is proportionate to punishments given to other players in the past.
Just because we don't buy a player we are heavily linked with does not mean there was no interest or bid at all. Neither does it mean the bids that were marked in the papers weren't real.
y va marquer wrote:Hmmm. It's the least likely but how come it's the rumour that the more reputable newspapers are going with?
It looks like someone in the Liverpool camp leaked the story to the press a few days ago. It doesn't mean it's true though.