Express reckons we're interested in Skrtel.
Not sure I'd want him as a starter, but if we had him, Kos, Mert and Verm that should be enough defensive cover.
Express reckons we're interested in Skrtel.
Not sure I'd want him as a starter, but if we had him, Kos, Mert and Verm that should be enough defensive cover.
seems like overkill to have vermaelen or skrtel as 4th choice. anyone watch him a lot? is there any chance he regains form and usurps mertesacker's place?
I thought this thread was going to be about Stekelenburg !! Skeletor is usually how I picture his name...
He's shit. They want him out because he hasnt been able to adapt to Rodgers' style. How the hell would he fit ours then?
Had a terrible season, i doubt we're interested.
the guy is a CB, who gives a shit about playing style? just defend and get the ball to a midfielder as fast as you can. since when is brendan rodgers some sort of barometer for proper football?
Mertersacker could certainly learn from him how to lump the ball to safety rather than deliver that hospital pass
think there might be something to it, in his zenit days, i remember him admitting :1) arsenal were constantly watching him 2.) he is an arsenal fan
he didnt get on with rodgers and really had a bad season, but the season before he was one of their best players, theres a good player in him
I don't think Mertesacker has anything to learn from Martin Skrtel.
Armor wrote:Had a terrible season, i doubt we're interested.
Appalling, and not just on the ball. He's been beaten too easily too often this season.
Fuck no. I'd rather keep Mertesacker, and that's saying something.