General Football News: Page 56 - The Arsenal discussion forum and community: One More in the Tolly

General Football News

Captain

They can't. There is no way for that panel to prove that they are doing anything wrong.

goon

Even if you ignore the amount of the figure that is sponsering what is essentially a wasteland, it would still leave the deal almost double the previous record. How can you not be able to judge whether or not that's above market value?

Rex

Of course it´s a bullshit deal, and of course UEFA can disqualify it. Agree with Capi that it is unlikely that they will though.

Captain

otfgoon wrote:
Even if you ignore the amount of the figure that is sponsering what is essentially a wasteland, it would still leave the deal almost double the previous record. How can you not be able to judge whether or not that's above market value?

How would it leave the deal almost double the previous record?

Barcelona just signed a £25m shirt sponsorship deal; UEFA absolutely cannot say that Man City don't 'deserve' the same deal. That's opening a ridiculous can of worms.

So, ignoring the "wasteland", all they have to account for is £15m per year. A quick google search tells me that the highest naming rights package in world sport is $20m a year, that's around £13m. ManCity are in the champions league now and are challenging for the championship in the most viewed sporting league in the world; a brief of even mediocre talent can argue that case if UEFA are stupid enough to challenge it.

Claudius

Absolutely right, Capi. Those are the figures that mid-ranking Americn tems have been able to get in recent years for stadium naming rights. Citeh are in good shape as far as defending their obscene package.

I bet, unlike us, they'll be able to re-negotiate that deal should someone like United shift the sponsorship goalposts again in a few years. Of course, it's not hard to negotiate with yourself

goon

The highest is actually 18.6m a year 😃

But I think Madison Square Garden and Barcelona are a tad more high profile than COMS and City. It's a bit like saying if a Bugatti Veyron can go for 2m who's to say a Ford Focus doesn't deserve the same. It also opens a ridiculous can of worms if it's allowed as they could pretty much sponser anything and everything to get by the FFP rules.

It's hard to get into it without a breakdown, but it's got nothing to do with what they deserve and everything to do with what you'd expect a club in their position to get. With Tottenham and more importantly Chelsea struggling to get even £10m a year deals, you can't say it's at market value.

Captain

The Madison square garden deal isn't for stadium naming rights as far as I know.

As I said, there is no legitimate way to argue against what they are doing and that's what it comes down to.

Klaus

Tony Montana wrote:
Klaus wrote:
How have they shown that? They've spent more money in the past seven years than any other club in the world.

But they haven't won what they've wanted to win or what they should have won with all that money.

The only reason they're one of the best clubs in the world today is because of the money they've spent.

Ricky1985

Would dearly, dearly love those quotes to be true:

http://www.espn.co.uk/football/sport/story/100342.html

You tell 'em Luka!

Captain

Same as the Cesc situation. People in glass houses and whatnot...

Ricky1985

Where are these Cesc quotes you speak of?

As things stand, if we don't sell Cesc this summer he will walk out next season onto the pitch at the Emirates wearing the captain's armband, giving his all with the full support of the fans - can't say the same for Modric after those quotes. Delightful. 😃

Captain

Don't need quotes and the fans are already considering that Cesc should lose his captaincy. Not quite the full support that you speak of.

Timbob

It would take a massive climb down from Tottenham to sell him, though. He can say what he wants but my money would be on him staying, and after a bit of a sulk or whatever he'll get back down to the business of playing football.

Ricky1985

Captain wrote:
Don't need quotes and the fans are already considering that Cesc should lose his captaincy. Not quite the full support that you speak of.

Don't agree. Cesc staying will be cause for celebration to the vast, overwhelming majority of fans. He'll still get the loudest cheer in the stadium next season, you know that.

Ricky1985

Tim wrote:
It would take a massive climb down from Tottenham to sell him, though. He can say what he wants but my money would be on him staying, and after a bit of a sulk or whatever he'll get back down to the business of playing football.

It could still turn around, but bad words like that create bad blood between the player and the fan, who, at the end of the day are always going to side with their club. It's a slippery slope from there, as we have seen ourselves at Arsenal with Adebayor, and to a lesser extent, Nasri - and neither of them said anything nearly as inflammatory or direct as Modric.

Captain

Ricky1985 wrote:
Captain wrote:
Don't need quotes and the fans are already considering that Cesc should lose his captaincy. Not quite the full support that you speak of.

Don't agree. Cesc staying will be cause for celebration to the vast, overwhelming majority of fans. He'll still get the loudest cheer in the stadium next season, you know that.

So will Modric.

Ricky1985

I don't know enough about Spurs to know if he's as popular as Cesc is at Arsenal, or whether Bale or VDV, maybe King, are the crowd favourites over there. I do know those words will have done serious, possibly irreparable, damage, though. Fans don't forget players saying they want to leave and stinging criticism of their club quickly. Either way I'm pleased.

Timbob

If I was to put money on it, I'd say Modric will be sold next summer.

Ricky1985

Would probably be my guess too. I think it'll work similar to Adebayor's situation - bumper new contract, then off for a big fee next summer, with the crowd never really warming to him throughout the season.

Tony Montana

Klaus wrote:
Tony Montana wrote:
But they haven't won what they've wanted to win or what they should have won with all that money.

The only reason they're one of the best clubs in the world today is because of the money they've spent.

They're a shit club, you know that.

You mean to say that they're one of the richest clubs and one of the best teams. Sure. But their riches never made them the best team in Europe and for many years not even the best team in England.

In terms of playing style they left a lot to be desired....with all their riches (although in all honestly I never gave a crap about that apart from the beginning of the 2004/05 season).

But why do all their managers keep getting sacked? They don't deliver.

They've been overtaken by City in terms of funds but for me they've been poor for the money they've poured in these past 5 years. Better than us but that's easy.

« Previous Page Next Page »