I'm not denouncing anything (well not too directly π ), I'm just calling your claim "any attempt to stifle the free market and the free movement of capital and labour is doomed to failure" into question.
As it turns out, regulations mean that banks make money hand over fist for their employees and stakeholders with relatively few serious risks for them, unless they go bust, in which case trillions get handed over in bailouts from the public purse.
The degree of regulation of the finance industry is crazy. The idea that regulation simply doesn't work is wrong - cf Australia's banking sector during the GFC. The truth seems to be that wrong regulation results in moral hazard and bad results. Anyway.