• Other Football
  • Article about FIFA by "Transparency International". Discuss!

FIFA: a special case

FIFA is both a non-governmental, non-profit organisation and a global company with huge revenues,
unprecedented reach, political clout and enormous worldwide social influence. But unlike a
multinational company, answerable to shareholders, FIFA’s mandate comes from the member
federations represented by officials (i.e. presidents and delegates, mostly working on a voluntary
basis) from all over the world, elected bottom up. This means that FIFA is answerable to the 208
national football associations who themselves are partly dependent on the funds that FIFA allocates to
them. This lack of mandatory accountability to the outside world makes it unlikely that change will
come either from within the organisation or from the grassroots of the football organisations.
Moreover, the scale and specific structure of FIFA makes it difficult to adapt what is considered best
business practice to the governance challenges it is facing.

Reform, therefore, will have to be innovative: FIFA must adapt what is already proven to work but also
introduce new ways of managing its affairs. If done well, this could provide a model not only for the
governance of world football but also for other sports that face comparable challenges.

The pressure to reform is coming from everyone who has a stake in the game: the supporters and the
teams, the communities of clubs and players, and the sponsors. To these must be added the media,
which in many cases has developed an almost symbiotic association with the world of football, as well
as governments and international organisations – and finally, due to the massive popularity of the
sport, the general public.

Reform must be a collaborative effort that includes FIFA’s officials and top management and has the
explicit support of the continental and national federations, clubs, sponsors, governments and civil
society.

Transparency International, therefore, calls for the creation of a multi-stakeholder group drawn from
FIFA’s stakeholders. Such a multi-stakeholder group would assist the process of re-establishing the
credibility of FIFA and world football and would work with FIFA to develop strong anti-bribery and anti-
corruption measures. Transparency International would be pleased to assist in establishing and
facilitating such a multi-stakeholder group.

This challenge can only be undertaken if FIFA’s leadership is clearly committed to reform, and to
leading top-down reform: a reform in the overall governance structures that involves an acceptance of
accountability and transparency, backed up by a clear plan to institutionalise detailed procedures for
dealing with bribery and corruption. The different steps of such a plan are outlined below.

https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:rVdMnUdqOcAJ:www.transparency.de/fileadmin/pdfs/Themen/Sport/FIFA_SafeHands.pdf+who+are+fifa+answerable+to&hl=en&gl=uk&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESjbaP83BgKoz_6Xv-Ukugn-0c-g1_oFeByIJ42-dwUil_WnoJ_SK1embFESt_zykiAAKfDoUDMtvX14C2IiRySfZKNz2Rkmjh4PF0t-_Pqe_hjWHx7kXsK23eYoNZOuTOqHEuf5&sig=AHIEtbSWhqAdVStzhPCmXqQaxPnItnVYOQ

Should have stuck it in the football section, mate.

Wasn't sure it would be interesting enough. Feel free to move it.

I is not a mod coz off ma english.

What do we think, first warning or straight demotion?

😆 Yellow card surely. You are not Mike Dean.
As resident IT expert on servers etc, can you do the honours without the mods noticing.
Anyways, this discussion is timeless as FIFA is not changing anytime soon.
My view is that UEFA have to break away for anything to happen as FIFA would lose sponsors/money.
Only wish Lennart had done it after Joao shafted him!

Friend of mine is doing a PhD on multi-stakeholder governance focused on ICANN (the group that controls various aspects of the net, like the TLDs).

To me this suggests Transparency International are just a bunch of concerned wonks making a pitch for relevance on behalf of the new hotness in academic research.

FIFA
by
Transparency International

It's not.

END OF ARTICLE

Bandy, Future CEO

2 years later

I think it's time to bump this one again.
International football is certainly not as interesting as the real thing, but its difficult to ignore the crisis in the international game caused by FIFA's fraudulent awarding of the 2022 World cup to Qatar and allowing the 2018 to continue in Russia despite them being an international pariah.
I'm sure that most people will be aware that there is growing support for a boycotting of both tournament's especially from the FA, but the support of the major European FA's is unknown and will be crucial in any campaign for the reform of FIFA.

http://www.football365.com/news/21554/9567649/World-Cup-Michael-Garcia-and-Hans-Joachim-Eckert-to-discuss-FIFA-bidding-report

4 months later

"The monetary gulf between England's top division and its continental rivals - which will widen further when its new three-season deal kicks in from 2016-17 - is amply demonstrated by the fact Bayern Munich received £30m for winning the Bundesliga last term while Cardiff City were awarded £62m after being relegated to the Championship."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/32138409

Biggus wrote:

I think it's time to bump this one again.
International football is certainly not as interesting as the real thing, but its difficult to ignore the crisis in the international game caused by FIFA's fraudulent awarding of the 2022 World cup to Qatar and allowing the 2018 to continue in Russia despite them being an international pariah.
I'm sure that most people will be aware that there is growing support for a boycotting of both tournament's especially from the FA, but the support of the major European FA's is unknown and will be crucial in any campaign for the reform of FIFA.

For once I think Blatter being a corrupt prick works in favour of the game. I don't see what role Russia's status as an international pariah should have to do with the game and I'd be in general very cautious when mixing politics and football as your viewpoint on the former very depends heavily on your where you live in or your personal views. Putin is far from an angel but you can make a very good case for him not being the main offender in the current Russia crisis.

Qatar however can fuck off - not for political but sporting reasons.

I agree with you about mixing football or indeed any sport and politics as it brings up the unsavoury possibility of it being used as a weapon in international diplomacy, we don't have to go back far in history to see that it made a farce of the Moscow 80 and LA 84 Olympics.
Having said that Russia is too big a pariah to be pushed around like others but the victims of ma17 are still dead and no one has been yet brought to justice and there are very few weapons available to exert influence on them because Putin is still very much in control and is protecting the murderers, the Russian people must be nudged in the direction of getting rid of him if they want to have the world cup.
However football personalities are much more higher profile than in the days when Ali Cryuff & Breitner took political stances, I'd like to see modern stars take a similar stance......If I'm not being too naive.

Qatar however can fuck off - For both political and sporting reasons.

Qatar can fuck off for not putting a U after the Q.

Yeah for that and for financing and harbouring terrorists.

Biggus wrote:

I agree with you about mixing football or indeed any sport and politics as it brings up the unsavoury possibility of it being used as a weapon in international diplomacy, we don't have to go back far in history to see that it made a farce of the Moscow 80 and LA 84 Olympics.

Having said that Russia is too big a pariah to be pushed around like others but the victims of ma17 are still dead and no one has been yet brought to justice and there are very few weapons available to exert influence on them because Putin is still very much in control and is protecting the murderers, the Russian people must be nudged in the direction of getting rid of him if they want to have the world cup

There is a big contradiction in your post here. If the Russian people must be made to get rid of Putin because he's protecting murderers we'll also have to ban virtually every other country from international football too. Compared to the US or Germany I reckon Putin isn't even the worst of the bunch.

No contradiction Jonesy I said it would be unsavoury, in general I think sport and politics should be kept as far apart as possible but as I said there are few weapons you can use against a superpower.
They are pretty much immune to hard power the only option is soft power.
I don't know why you keep defending Putin he's a dictatorial undemocratic fascist with plenty of blood on his hands, but I agree expecting FIFA to take a principled stand on anything is like expecting a dog to shit in the toilet, but as I said before I'd like to see individual countries or players take one, In these days of social media it would spread like wildfire.
Or am I being too old fashioned and naive and the victims of this states terrorism are already forgotten in their graves.

I don't defend Putin, I just don't see a justification to shit on Russia when we're letting Western countries off scot free whose list of crimes is easily on par. Like I said before, I certainly don't see Putin as a paradigm of democracy but I'm much more critical of the NATO countries given the blatant unilateral violations and contract breaches in the last decades. Also there's only one superpower on this planet currently and that sure as shit isn't Russia.

Two wrongs don't make a right, we're talking about Russia 18 here.
And btw theres three superpowers.